2021•The Encyclopedia of Philosophy of ReligionRequires access

Korea, Neo‐Confucian Philosophy in

Edward Y. J. Chung

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Yi Hwang (Toegye, 1501–1570), Yi I (Yulgok, 1536–1584), and Jeong Yagyong (Dasan, 1762–1836) were the three most eminent Neo‐Confucians in Korea. Toegye strongly influenced Korean Neo‐Confucianism (seongnihak) by articulating the “sagely learning” that must integrate knowledge, moral practice, and spiritual cultivation. His “Four‐seven debate letters” also enrich the moral‐spiritual dimension of Neo‐Confucianism by emphasizing principle (i), mind cultivation, and reverence. Yulgok advocated political, economic, and social improvement by addressing the fundamentals of ethics and statecraft. His “Four‐seven” philosophy presents a systematic interpretation of human nature, emotions, and self‐cultivation by highlighting the idea of material force (gi). Dasan, the most famous Silhak (practical learning) thinker, criticized Seongnihak orthodoxy and defined thesilhakin terms of promoting people's daily lives. He charged that the metaphysics of principle and material force is not based on the original classics; the unifying thread of Neo‐Confucianism is the inseparable link between personal cultivation and public service.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Yi Hwang (Toegye, 1501–1570), Yi I (Yulgok, 1536–1584), and Jeong Yagyong (Dasan, 1762–1836) were the three most eminent Neo‐Confucians in Korea. Toegye strongly influenced Korean Neo‐Confucianism (seongnihak) by articulating the “sagely learning” that must integrate knowledge, moral practice, and spiritual cultivation. His “Four‐seven debate letters” also enrich the moral‐spiritual dimension of Neo‐Confucianism by emphasizing principle (i), mind cultivation, and reverence. Yulgok advocated political, economic, and social improvement by addressing the fundamentals of ethics and statecraft. His “Four‐seven” philosophy presents a systematic interpretation of human nature, emotions, and self‐cultivation by highlighting the idea of material force (gi). Dasan, the most famous Silhak (practical learning) thinker, criticized Seongnihak orthodoxy and defined thesilhakin terms of promoting people's daily lives. He charged that the metaphysics of principle and material force is not based on the original classics; the unifying thread of Neo‐Confucianism is the inseparable link between personal cultivation and public service.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Yi Hwang (Toegye, 1501–1570), Yi I (Yulgok, 1536–1584), and Jeong Yagyong (Dasan, 1762–1836) were the three most eminent Neo‐Confucians in Korea. Toegye strongly influenced Korean Neo‐Confucianism (seongnihak) by articulating the “sagely learning” that must integrate knowledge, moral practice, and spiritual cultivation. His “Four‐seven debate letters” also enrich the moral‐spiritual dimension of Neo‐Confucianism by emphasizing principle (i), mind cultivation, and reverence. Yulgok advocated political, economic, and social improvement by addressing the fundamentals of ethics and statecraft. His “Four‐seven” philosophy presents a systematic interpretation of human nature, emotions, and self‐cultivation by highlighting the idea of material force (gi). Dasan, the most famous Silhak (practical learning) thinker, criticized Seongnihak orthodoxy and defined thesilhakin terms of promoting people's daily lives. He charged that the metaphysics of principle and material force is not based on the original classics; the unifying thread of Neo‐Confucianism is the inseparable link between personal cultivation and public service.

Key concepts: Reverence, Orthodoxy, Politics, Interpretation (philosophy), Metaphysics, Neo-Confucianism, Moral philosophy, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Korea, Neo‐Confucian Philosophy in — Research Paper | ScholarLens