2021The Indonesian Journal of Accounting ResearchOpen access

Did the accounting for goodwill create a bubble?

Bingyi Chen, Ariel Markelevich, Irene Guannan Wang

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

This article investigates the accounting standards changes related to business acquisitions and the impact of those changes on the reported goodwill in the past 50 years. We observe that the amount of goodwill on companies’ balance sheets steadily increased before 2001 but has risen to new levels with the adoption of SFAS 141. Goodwill is now equal to about 30 percent of companies’ net assets compared to only about 7 percent in the 1980s. We examine whether the increased levels of goodwill could have resulted from changes in accounting standards. Specifically, we investigate the impacts of accounting regulations on goodwill reporting under three different regimes: APB 16 and 17, SFAS 141 and 142, and SFAS 141(R). We find that the increase in the reported value of goodwill is not a result of an increase in public companies’ acquisitions, as those have actually decreased over time. Further, the increase overlaps with the changes to the accounting for goodwill and the switch from goodwill amortization to impairment. Our findings are timely and important because the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has a concurrent project revisiting Identifiable Intangible Assets and Subsequent Accounting for Goodwill (FASB 2020). Our evidence urges caution in the reintroduction of goodwill amortization proposed by FASB, as the level of goodwill has increased dramatically despite FASB’s intentions to improve the quality of goodwill accounting and curtail management’s goodwill manipulation.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article investigates the accounting standards changes related to business acquisitions and the impact of those changes on the reported goodwill in the past 50 years. We observe that the amount of goodwill on companies’ balance sheets steadily increased before 2001 but has risen to new levels with the adoption of SFAS 141. Goodwill is now equal to about 30 percent of companies’ net assets compared to only about 7 percent in the 1980s. We examine whether the increased levels of goodwill could have resulted from changes in accounting standards. Specifically, we investigate the impacts of accounting regulations on goodwill reporting under three different regimes: APB 16 and 17, SFAS 141 and 142, and SFAS 141(R). We find that the increase in the reported value of goodwill is not a result of an increase in public companies’ acquisitions, as those have actually decreased over time. Further, the increase overlaps with the changes to the accounting for goodwill and the switch from goodwill amortization to impairment. Our findings are timely and important because the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has a concurrent project revisiting Identifiable Intangible Assets and Subsequent Accounting for Goodwill (FASB 2020). Our evidence urges caution in the reintroduction of goodwill amortization proposed by FASB, as the level of goodwill has increased dramatically despite FASB’s intentions to improve the quality of goodwill accounting and curtail management’s goodwill manipulation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article investigates the accounting standards changes related to business acquisitions and the impact of those changes on the reported goodwill in the past 50 years. We observe that the amount of goodwill on companies’ balance sheets steadily increased before 2001 but has risen to new levels with the adoption of SFAS 141. Goodwill is now equal to about 30 percent of companies’ net assets compared to only about 7 percent in the 1980s. We examine whether the increased levels of goodwill could have resulted from changes in accounting standards. Specifically, we investigate the impacts of accounting regulations on goodwill reporting under three different regimes: APB 16 and 17, SFAS 141 and 142, and SFAS 141(R). We find that the increase in the reported value of goodwill is not a result of an increase in public companies’ acquisitions, as those have actually decreased over time. Further, the increase overlaps with the changes to the accounting for goodwill and the switch from goodwill amortization to impairment. Our findings are timely and important because the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has a concurrent project revisiting Identifiable Intangible Assets and Subsequent Accounting for Goodwill (FASB 2020). Our evidence urges caution in the reintroduction of goodwill amortization proposed by FASB, as the level of goodwill has increased dramatically despite FASB’s intentions to improve the quality of goodwill accounting and curtail management’s goodwill manipulation.

Key concepts: Goodwill, Amortization, Accounting, Business, Book value, Fair value, Financial accounting, Finance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Did the accounting for goodwill create a bubble? — Research Paper | ScholarLens