2021Unpublished venueRequires access

The Enemy Is White Supremacy

Hannah R. Stohry, Jing Tan, Brittany Aronson

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

White supremacy is globalized into a system onto which unearned privileges associated with being white means irreversible damage and disempowerment for those identified as people of color (, p. 476). Scholarship in the United States continues to only focus on white supremacy within the U.S., thus neglecting the fact that white supremacy is global. When theorizing about white supremacy in other countries, one must not use the same lens or understanding of how white supremacy manifests. This chapter illuminates, using the cases of South Korea and China, that whiteness and white supremacy is much more than an issue of Black/white or U.S./western/European. The authors contribute positionalities that demonstrate lived experience as influential in shaping knowledge production in educational spaces, particularly as they relate to global white supremacy, and our personal interests in re-orienting how white supremacy is talked about in the context of South Korea and China. The construction of otherness and racial formation processes in South Korea and China are socio-historically situated, linking arms with global white supremacy, and this chapter concludes with implications for liberation through consciousness-raising and educational opportunities.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

White supremacy is globalized into a system onto which unearned privileges associated with being white means irreversible damage and disempowerment for those identified as people of color (, p. 476). Scholarship in the United States continues to only focus on white supremacy within the U.S., thus neglecting the fact that white supremacy is global. When theorizing about white supremacy in other countries, one must not use the same lens or understanding of how white supremacy manifests. This chapter illuminates, using the cases of South Korea and China, that whiteness and white supremacy is much more than an issue of Black/white or U.S./western/European. The authors contribute positionalities that demonstrate lived experience as influential in shaping knowledge production in educational spaces, particularly as they relate to global white supremacy, and our personal interests in re-orienting how white supremacy is talked about in the context of South Korea and China. The construction of otherness and racial formation processes in South Korea and China are socio-historically situated, linking arms with global white supremacy, and this chapter concludes with implications for liberation through consciousness-raising and educational opportunities.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

White supremacy is globalized into a system onto which unearned privileges associated with being white means irreversible damage and disempowerment for those identified as people of color (, p. 476). Scholarship in the United States continues to only focus on white supremacy within the U.S., thus neglecting the fact that white supremacy is global. When theorizing about white supremacy in other countries, one must not use the same lens or understanding of how white supremacy manifests. This chapter illuminates, using the cases of South Korea and China, that whiteness and white supremacy is much more than an issue of Black/white or U.S./western/European. The authors contribute positionalities that demonstrate lived experience as influential in shaping knowledge production in educational spaces, particularly as they relate to global white supremacy, and our personal interests in re-orienting how white supremacy is talked about in the context of South Korea and China. The construction of otherness and racial formation processes in South Korea and China are socio-historically situated, linking arms with global white supremacy, and this chapter concludes with implications for liberation through consciousness-raising and educational opportunities.

Key concepts: White supremacy, White (mutation), Scholarship, Political science, China, Context (archaeology), Gender studies, Political economy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Enemy Is White Supremacy — Research Paper | ScholarLens