Philosophical Implications of Generative Grammar
Peter Ludlow
Abstract
Peter Ludlow
Abstract
Since generative grammar was born a half-century ago, it has had a close relationship with analytic philosophy. This relationship has cut in two directions – philosophy has informed generative grammar, and generative grammar has provided evidence for certain philosophical positions. The result has been a kind of symbiotic relationship. In this chapter, I am going to look at the relationship in both directions, with examples of how philosophy has (mis)informed linguistics, and how linguistics has (mis)informed philosophy. I use the optional prefix mis - because sometimes philosophers have led linguists down paths to nowhere, and vice versa.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Since generative grammar was born a half-century ago, it has had a close relationship with analytic philosophy. This relationship has cut in two directions – philosophy has informed generative grammar, and generative grammar has provided evidence for certain philosophical positions. The result has been a kind of symbiotic relationship. In this chapter, I am going to look at the relationship in both directions, with examples of how philosophy has (mis)informed linguistics, and how linguistics has (mis)informed philosophy. I use the optional prefix mis - because sometimes philosophers have led linguists down paths to nowhere, and vice versa.
Key concepts: Generative grammar, Emergent grammar, Linguistics, Prefix, Grammar, Relational grammar, Transformational grammar, Philosophy