2021International PsychogeriatricsOpen access

544 - Validation of a new cognitive screening tool, the Brain Health Test-7, for identification of mild cognitive impairment and early dementia in 3 differentkinds of hospital settings

Meng-Shiuan Shie, Mei Xian Loi, His-Chung Chen, Ming H. Hsieh, Yi‐Ting Lin, Chen‐Chung Liu, Pei‐Ning Wang, Jiahn‐Jyh Chen, Cheng‐Sheng Chen, Chih‐Cheng Hsu, Tzung‐Jeng Hwang

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

BackgroundThe Brain Health Test-7 (BHT-7) is a revised tool from the original BHT, containing more tests about frontal lobe function. It was developed with theaim of identifying patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and early dementia.Research objectiveHere we report the validity of the BHT-7 versus the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in differentpsychiatry or neurology clinics.MethodsPatients with memory complaints were recruited in this study from the outpatient clinic of psychiatry or neurology in 3 different kinds of hospitals. Allpatients underwent the evaluation of the BHT-7, MMSE, MoCA, and clinical dementia rating (CDR). The clinical diagnosis (normal, MCI, dementia) was made by consensus meeting, taking into account all available data.Demographic data and the scores of the MMSE, MoCA, and BHT-7 between groups were compared. Logistic regression was adopted for analysis of optimal cutoff values, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve,and the area under the ROC curve (AUC).ResultsWe enrolled a total of 1090 subjects (normal 402, MCI 317, dementia 371); of them, 705 (64.7%) were female. There was a statistically significant differencein age, years of education, and 3 cognitive test scores among the 3 groups.Compared with the MMSE and MoCA, the BHT-7 performed slightly betterthan MMSE and MoCA in differentiating MCI or dementia from the normalcontrols (Table 1). For BHT- 7, the cutoff point was 17 between normal andMCI, and 14 between normal and dementia. These cutoff points for BHT-7were consistent through 3 different clinical settings, but inconsistent for MMSE and MoCA. The testing time for the BHT-7 was about 5-7 minutes, shorter than that of the MMSE and MoCA.ConclusionCompared with MMSE and MoCA, the BHT-7 showed slightly better performance in differentiating normal from MCI or dementia subjects. The testing time for the BHT-7 was shorter, and its cutoff points were consistent through different outpatient clinic settings. The results support that BHT-7 is auseful cognitive screening tool for MCI or early dementia in various hospital settings.Table 1Comparisons of the performance of BHT-7, MMSE, MoCAAUCcutoffSENSPEPPVNPVNormal vs. MCIBHT-70.8532≦170.81700.74130.71350.8371MMSE0.8061≦270.79500.68830.66840.8091MoCA0.8316≦250.82020.67910.66840.8273Normal vs. DementiaBHT-70.9848≦140.94340.96020.95630.9484MMSE0.9693≦240.88950.96260.95650.9040MoCA0.9768≦210.92450.94280.93720.9312Normal vs. MCI + DementiaBHT-70.9241≦160.83720.84580.90280.7522MMSE0.8941≦250.72820.91520.93650.6625MoCA0.9099≦230.80810.85320.90410.7221

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BackgroundThe Brain Health Test-7 (BHT-7) is a revised tool from the original BHT, containing more tests about frontal lobe function. It was developed with theaim of identifying patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and early dementia.Research objectiveHere we report the validity of the BHT-7 versus the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in differentpsychiatry or neurology clinics.MethodsPatients with memory complaints were recruited in this study from the outpatient clinic of psychiatry or neurology in 3 different kinds of hospitals. Allpatients underwent the evaluation of the BHT-7, MMSE, MoCA, and clinical dementia rating (CDR). The clinical diagnosis (normal, MCI, dementia) was made by consensus meeting, taking into account all available data.Demographic data and the scores of the MMSE, MoCA, and BHT-7 between groups were compared. Logistic regression was adopted for analysis of optimal cutoff values, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve,and the area under the ROC curve (AUC).ResultsWe enrolled a total of 1090 subjects (normal 402, MCI 317, dementia 371); of them, 705 (64.7%) were female. There was a statistically significant differencein age, years of education, and 3 cognitive test scores among the 3 groups.Compared with the MMSE and MoCA, the BHT-7 performed slightly betterthan MMSE and MoCA in differentiating MCI or dementia from the normalcontrols (Table 1). For BHT- 7, the cutoff point was 17 between normal andMCI, and 14 between normal and dementia. These cutoff points for BHT-7were consistent through 3 different clinical settings, but inconsistent for MMSE and MoCA. The testing time for the BHT-7 was about 5-7 minutes, shorter than that of the MMSE and MoCA.ConclusionCompared with MMSE and MoCA, the BHT-7 showed slightly better performance in differentiating normal from MCI or dementia subjects. The testing time for the BHT-7 was shorter, and its cutoff points were consistent through different outpatient clinic settings. The results support that BHT-7 is auseful cognitive screening tool for MCI or early dementia in various hospital settings.Table 1Comparisons of the performance of BHT-7, MMSE, MoCAAUCcutoffSENSPEPPVNPVNormal vs. MCIBHT-70.8532≦170.81700.74130.71350.8371MMSE0.8061≦270.79500.68830.66840.8091MoCA0.8316≦250.82020.67910.66840.8273Normal vs. DementiaBHT-70.9848≦140.94340.96020.95630.9484MMSE0.9693≦240.88950.96260.95650.9040MoCA0.9768≦210.92450.94280.93720.9312Normal vs. MCI + DementiaBHT-70.9241≦160.83720.84580.90280.7522MMSE0.8941≦250.72820.91520.93650.6625MoCA0.9099≦230.80810.85320.90410.7221

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BackgroundThe Brain Health Test-7 (BHT-7) is a revised tool from the original BHT, containing more tests about frontal lobe function. It was developed with theaim of identifying patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and early dementia.Research objectiveHere we report the validity of the BHT-7 versus the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in differentpsychiatry or neurology clinics.MethodsPatients with memory complaints were recruited in this study from the outpatient clinic of psychiatry or neurology in 3 different kinds of hospitals. Allpatients underwent the evaluation of the BHT-7, MMSE, MoCA, and clinical dementia rating (CDR). The clinical diagnosis (normal, MCI, dementia) was made by consensus meeting, taking into account all available data.Demographic data and the scores of the MMSE, MoCA, and BHT-7 between groups were compared. Logistic regression was adopted for analysis of optimal cutoff values, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve,and the area under the ROC curve (AUC).ResultsWe enrolled a total of 1090 subjects (normal 402, MCI 317, dementia 371); of them, 705 (64.7%) were female. There was a statistically significant differencein age, years of education, and 3 cognitive test scores among the 3 groups.Compared with the MMSE and MoCA, the BHT-7 performed slightly betterthan MMSE and MoCA in differentiating MCI or dementia from the normalcontrols (Table 1). For BHT- 7, the cutoff point was 17 between normal andMCI, and 14 between normal and dementia. These cutoff points for BHT-7were consistent through 3 different clinical settings, but inconsistent for MMSE and MoCA. The testing time for the BHT-7 was about 5-7 minutes, shorter than that of the MMSE and MoCA.ConclusionCompared with MMSE and MoCA, the BHT-7 showed slightly better performance in differentiating normal from MCI or dementia subjects. The testing time for the BHT-7 was shorter, and its cutoff points were consistent through different outpatient clinic settings. The results support that BHT-7 is auseful cognitive screening tool for MCI or early dementia in various hospital settings.Table 1Comparisons of the performance of BHT-7, MMSE, MoCAAUCcutoffSENSPEPPVNPVNormal vs. MCIBHT-70.8532≦170.81700.74130.71350.8371MMSE0.8061≦270.79500.68830.66840.8091MoCA0.8316≦250.82020.67910.66840.8273Normal vs. DementiaBHT-70.9848≦140.94340.96020.95630.9484MMSE0.9693≦240.88950.96260.95650.9040MoCA0.9768≦210.92450.94280.93720.9312Normal vs. MCI + DementiaBHT-70.9241≦160.83720.84580.90280.7522MMSE0.8941≦250.72820.91520.93650.6625MoCA0.9099≦230.80810.85320.90410.7221

Key concepts: Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Dementia, Receiver operating characteristic, Logistic regression, Medicine, Neurology, Clinical Dementia Rating, Area under the curve

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
544 - Validation of a new cognitive screening tool, the Brain Health Test-7, for identification of mild cognitive impairment and early dementia in 3 differentkinds of hospital settings — Research Paper | ScholarLens