2021•Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies journalRequires access

The Adoption Determinants of Mobile Technologies in the Accounting Profession

Hassairi Ahmed Foued

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Given that mobile technology has become a disruptive innovation, with new service solutions for both users and customers, it remains yet underexplored in managerial and in operational issues. This study explains the adoption of accountants' mobile technology usage behavior by moving beyond the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and building on the modified and extended Unified Theory of Technology Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model. The proposals in this research are based on the TAM model and the UTAUT model. This research adopts a hypothetical-deductive approach supported by a questionnaire for which one hundred Tunisian accountants responded. The results of this study highlight the influence of performance expectancy, facilitating conditions, and task variety on the current use of mobile technologies in the accounting profession. Overall, the extended model was able to explain 49,5% of the variance in behavioral intention to adopt and use mobile technology.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Given that mobile technology has become a disruptive innovation, with new service solutions for both users and customers, it remains yet underexplored in managerial and in operational issues. This study explains the adoption of accountants' mobile technology usage behavior by moving beyond the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and building on the modified and extended Unified Theory of Technology Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model. The proposals in this research are based on the TAM model and the UTAUT model. This research adopts a hypothetical-deductive approach supported by a questionnaire for which one hundred Tunisian accountants responded. The results of this study highlight the influence of performance expectancy, facilitating conditions, and task variety on the current use of mobile technologies in the accounting profession. Overall, the extended model was able to explain 49,5% of the variance in behavioral intention to adopt and use mobile technology.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Given that mobile technology has become a disruptive innovation, with new service solutions for both users and customers, it remains yet underexplored in managerial and in operational issues. This study explains the adoption of accountants' mobile technology usage behavior by moving beyond the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and building on the modified and extended Unified Theory of Technology Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model. The proposals in this research are based on the TAM model and the UTAUT model. This research adopts a hypothetical-deductive approach supported by a questionnaire for which one hundred Tunisian accountants responded. The results of this study highlight the influence of performance expectancy, facilitating conditions, and task variety on the current use of mobile technologies in the accounting profession. Overall, the extended model was able to explain 49,5% of the variance in behavioral intention to adopt and use mobile technology.

Key concepts: Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology, Expectancy theory, Variance (accounting), Variety (cybernetics), Technology acceptance model, Mobile technology, Marketing, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Adoption Determinants of Mobile Technologies in the Accounting Profession — Research Paper | ScholarLens