2021Otolaryngology Open Access JournalOpen access

Comparative study of Crescentic Cartilage and Anterior Tucking Tympanoplasty

Abhishek Gupta

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Introduction: This study was undertaken to know the better technique of two methods i.e. cresentric cartilage tympanoplasty (CCT) and anterior tucking tympanoplasty (ATT) operated by single handed endoscopically. Material and Methods: This study was conducted on hundred patients at Shyam Shah Medical College, Rewa, MP. Hundred patients were selected using certain criteria and fifty patients each were operated by cresentric cartilage supported tympanoplasty(CCT) and anterior tucking technique(ATT). Audiometrically results were analysed preoperatively and postoperatively. Results: Maximum patients affected were teens and males. Maximum patients had large central perforation followed by subtotal and then total perforations in both the groups of cresentric cartilage tympanoplasty (CCT) and anterior tucking tympanoplasty (ATT). We operated under local anaesthesia and some under general anaesthesia in both the groups. Discussion: Hearing being special sense organ needs restoration for normal development and personality grooming. Newer method with evolution of medical sciences have devised techniques of reconstruction of hearing mechanism to give better results. Comparative study using cresentric cartilage tympanoplasty (CCT) and anterior tucking tympanoplasty (ATT) was done to know the better outcome and method. Conclusion: Cresentric cartilage tympanoplasty (CCT) is better of the two methods as it doesn’t shrink or change the shape.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction: This study was undertaken to know the better technique of two methods i.e. cresentric cartilage tympanoplasty (CCT) and anterior tucking tympanoplasty (ATT) operated by single handed endoscopically. Material and Methods: This study was conducted on hundred patients at Shyam Shah Medical College, Rewa, MP. Hundred patients were selected using certain criteria and fifty patients each were operated by cresentric cartilage supported tympanoplasty(CCT) and anterior tucking technique(ATT). Audiometrically results were analysed preoperatively and postoperatively. Results: Maximum patients affected were teens and males. Maximum patients had large central perforation followed by subtotal and then total perforations in both the groups of cresentric cartilage tympanoplasty (CCT) and anterior tucking tympanoplasty (ATT). We operated under local anaesthesia and some under general anaesthesia in both the groups. Discussion: Hearing being special sense organ needs restoration for normal development and personality grooming. Newer method with evolution of medical sciences have devised techniques of reconstruction of hearing mechanism to give better results. Comparative study using cresentric cartilage tympanoplasty (CCT) and anterior tucking tympanoplasty (ATT) was done to know the better outcome and method. Conclusion: Cresentric cartilage tympanoplasty (CCT) is better of the two methods as it doesn’t shrink or change the shape.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction: This study was undertaken to know the better technique of two methods i.e. cresentric cartilage tympanoplasty (CCT) and anterior tucking tympanoplasty (ATT) operated by single handed endoscopically. Material and Methods: This study was conducted on hundred patients at Shyam Shah Medical College, Rewa, MP. Hundred patients were selected using certain criteria and fifty patients each were operated by cresentric cartilage supported tympanoplasty(CCT) and anterior tucking technique(ATT). Audiometrically results were analysed preoperatively and postoperatively. Results: Maximum patients affected were teens and males. Maximum patients had large central perforation followed by subtotal and then total perforations in both the groups of cresentric cartilage tympanoplasty (CCT) and anterior tucking tympanoplasty (ATT). We operated under local anaesthesia and some under general anaesthesia in both the groups. Discussion: Hearing being special sense organ needs restoration for normal development and personality grooming. Newer method with evolution of medical sciences have devised techniques of reconstruction of hearing mechanism to give better results. Comparative study using cresentric cartilage tympanoplasty (CCT) and anterior tucking tympanoplasty (ATT) was done to know the better outcome and method. Conclusion: Cresentric cartilage tympanoplasty (CCT) is better of the two methods as it doesn’t shrink or change the shape.

Key concepts: Tympanoplasty, Medicine, Cartilage, Surgery, Perforation, Otorhinolaryngology, Anatomy, Punching

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative study of Crescentic Cartilage and Anterior Tucking Tympanoplasty — Research Paper | ScholarLens