Comparing National Regulatory Processes for Safe Drinking Water
Douglas Crawford‐Brown, Robert S. Raucher, Adam T. Carpenter
Abstract
Open-access reader
Douglas Crawford‐Brown, Robert S. Raucher, Adam T. Carpenter
Abstract
Open-access reader
Key Takeaways Setting guidelines and standards helps form a framework for providing safe, reliable drinking water, a prevalent concern throughout the world. The regulatory processes of seven nations, including the United States, were compared to determine the best practices and identify areas needing improvement. An assessment consisting of eight attributes was used to examine these nations’ steps in establishing and maintaining drinking water regulations.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Key Takeaways Setting guidelines and standards helps form a framework for providing safe, reliable drinking water, a prevalent concern throughout the world. The regulatory processes of seven nations, including the United States, were compared to determine the best practices and identify areas needing improvement. An assessment consisting of eight attributes was used to examine these nations’ steps in establishing and maintaining drinking water regulations.
Key concepts: Key (lock), Environmental planning, Business, Best practice, Water safety, Environmental health, Environmental resource management, Risk analysis (engineering)