2021British journal of surgeryOpen access

EP.TH.756Post-operative sepsis: Is CT reliable in diagnosing the cause of post-operative sepsis?

Rajesh Chidambaranath, Ramprasad Rajebhosale, Pradeep Thomas

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Aim To assess the reliability of computerised tomography in post-operative sepsis in patients who previously underwent laparotomy in the same hospital admission. Introduction Method This study was done on re-operations following an abdominal operation from April 2012 to April 2016 at a district general hospital. Data regarding demography, initial operation, post-operative problems, pre-operative diagnosis, and use of computed tomography, the findings on CT, and operative findings were collected. A comparison was made between the CT findings and findings on re-laparotomy. Also noted was the number of patients who did not have a re-laparotomy following CT. Result There were 87 patients, of whom, 10 had no accessible notes and were removed from the list. Of the remaining 77, 53(68.8%) had CT scans, 24 did not (31.2%). Of these that had CT, 29 (54.7%) had findings which matched with intra-operative findings on re-laparotomy, in 12 (22.6%) CT findings did not match 4(7.5%) had minor findings not needing surgery and 8(15.5%) had normal or insignificant findings. Conclusions We found in this study that, CT did have a significant contributory role in the arsenal of methods to aid source control in those patients that are septic following an abdominal operation, and this should be used as a pre-operative diagnostic modality.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Aim To assess the reliability of computerised tomography in post-operative sepsis in patients who previously underwent laparotomy in the same hospital admission. Introduction Method This study was done on re-operations following an abdominal operation from April 2012 to April 2016 at a district general hospital. Data regarding demography, initial operation, post-operative problems, pre-operative diagnosis, and use of computed tomography, the findings on CT, and operative findings were collected. A comparison was made between the CT findings and findings on re-laparotomy. Also noted was the number of patients who did not have a re-laparotomy following CT. Result There were 87 patients, of whom, 10 had no accessible notes and were removed from the list. Of the remaining 77, 53(68.8%) had CT scans, 24 did not (31.2%). Of these that had CT, 29 (54.7%) had findings which matched with intra-operative findings on re-laparotomy, in 12 (22.6%) CT findings did not match 4(7.5%) had minor findings not needing surgery and 8(15.5%) had normal or insignificant findings. Conclusions We found in this study that, CT did have a significant contributory role in the arsenal of methods to aid source control in those patients that are septic following an abdominal operation, and this should be used as a pre-operative diagnostic modality.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Aim To assess the reliability of computerised tomography in post-operative sepsis in patients who previously underwent laparotomy in the same hospital admission. Introduction Method This study was done on re-operations following an abdominal operation from April 2012 to April 2016 at a district general hospital. Data regarding demography, initial operation, post-operative problems, pre-operative diagnosis, and use of computed tomography, the findings on CT, and operative findings were collected. A comparison was made between the CT findings and findings on re-laparotomy. Also noted was the number of patients who did not have a re-laparotomy following CT. Result There were 87 patients, of whom, 10 had no accessible notes and were removed from the list. Of the remaining 77, 53(68.8%) had CT scans, 24 did not (31.2%). Of these that had CT, 29 (54.7%) had findings which matched with intra-operative findings on re-laparotomy, in 12 (22.6%) CT findings did not match 4(7.5%) had minor findings not needing surgery and 8(15.5%) had normal or insignificant findings. Conclusions We found in this study that, CT did have a significant contributory role in the arsenal of methods to aid source control in those patients that are septic following an abdominal operation, and this should be used as a pre-operative diagnostic modality.

Key concepts: Medicine, Laparotomy, Computed tomography, Sepsis, Abdominal computed tomography, Radiology, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
EP.TH.756Post-operative sepsis: Is CT reliable in diagnosing the cause of post-operative sepsis? — Research Paper | ScholarLens