[Efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis for acute severe cerebral infarction and risk factors of poor prognosis: a randomized controlled trial in 152 cases].
Y Zhai, Huqing Wang, Shuqin Zhan, Haiqin Wu
Abstract
Y Zhai, Huqing Wang, Shuqin Zhan, Haiqin Wu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute severe cerebral infarction and analyze the risk factors of poor prognosis after thrombolysis. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted among 152 patients with acute severe cerebral infarction, with the onset time all within 4.5 h. The patients were randomized into control group (76 cases) and observation group (76 cases) and received treatment with routine therapy (antiplatelet aggregation, statins, neuroprotection and drugs that stimulate blood flow) and intravenous thrombolytic therapy with alteplase in addition to the routine therapy, respectively. The NIHSS scores were recorded at 24 h, 1 week and 1 month after the treatment. The mRS scores at 3 months and the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at one week after the treatment were compared between the two groups. According to mRS scores at 3 months, the patients in the observation group were divided into good prognosis group (30 patients) and poor prognosis group (46 patients), and the risk factors for poor prognosis were analyzed using univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: =0.011) were identified as independent risk factors for poor prognosis after intravenous thrombolysis. CONCLUSION: Intravenous thrombolysis is effective and safe for patients with acute severe cerebral infarction, and the time from onset to thrombolysis, prethrombolytic systolic pressure and baseline NIHSS score are independent risk factors for a poor prognosis after intravenous thrombolysis.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute severe cerebral infarction and analyze the risk factors of poor prognosis after thrombolysis. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted among 152 patients with acute severe cerebral infarction, with the onset time all within 4.5 h. The patients were randomized into control group (76 cases) and observation group (76 cases) and received treatment with routine therapy (antiplatelet aggregation, statins, neuroprotection and drugs that stimulate blood flow) and intravenous thrombolytic therapy with alteplase in addition to the routine therapy, respectively. The NIHSS scores were recorded at 24 h, 1 week and 1 month after the treatment. The mRS scores at 3 months and the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at one week after the treatment were compared between the two groups. According to mRS scores at 3 months, the patients in the observation group were divided into good prognosis group (30 patients) and poor prognosis group (46 patients), and the risk factors for poor prognosis were analyzed using univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: =0.011) were identified as independent risk factors for poor prognosis after intravenous thrombolysis. CONCLUSION: Intravenous thrombolysis is effective and safe for patients with acute severe cerebral infarction, and the time from onset to thrombolysis, prethrombolytic systolic pressure and baseline NIHSS score are independent risk factors for a poor prognosis after intravenous thrombolysis.
Key concepts: Medicine, Thrombolysis, Randomized controlled trial, Incidence (geometry), Univariate analysis, Internal medicine, Cerebral infarction, Logistic regression