2019•SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Sustainable Level Debt, Expansionary Austerity, and Fiscal Consolidation Theories: A Critical Analysis

Muhamed Zulkhibri

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This commentary critically analyzes the debate between ‘deficit financing’ and ‘deficit-reduction financing’ in contemporary economics. Reading through the paper by Ann Pettifor (2019), one gets the impression that deficits don’t matter and that fiscal consolidation has not improved the public finances, at least for the advanced economies. Although Pettifor manages to pinpoint some of the fundamental errors in contemporary economic discussions on deficit financing, her paper puts undue emphasis on Keynes’s approach to public spending. Keynes’s argument was that increases in government spending will improve growth by boosting purchasing power into the economy. However, she fails to notice the basic problem with debt, that it keeps countries from investing in future growth. A more fundamental question to this debate should be to address the issues surrounding the sustainability of debt and the most effective means to reduce debt to sustainable levels. Therefore, fiscal restraint should be taken as an opportunity to make an economic virtue out of fiscal necessity, not to be politicized by politicians and policymakers to increase unnecessary and wasteful government spending that would expose countries to a higher degree of economic vulnerability.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This commentary critically analyzes the debate between ‘deficit financing’ and ‘deficit-reduction financing’ in contemporary economics. Reading through the paper by Ann Pettifor (2019), one gets the impression that deficits don’t matter and that fiscal consolidation has not improved the public finances, at least for the advanced economies. Although Pettifor manages to pinpoint some of the fundamental errors in contemporary economic discussions on deficit financing, her paper puts undue emphasis on Keynes’s approach to public spending. Keynes’s argument was that increases in government spending will improve growth by boosting purchasing power into the economy. However, she fails to notice the basic problem with debt, that it keeps countries from investing in future growth. A more fundamental question to this debate should be to address the issues surrounding the sustainability of debt and the most effective means to reduce debt to sustainable levels. Therefore, fiscal restraint should be taken as an opportunity to make an economic virtue out of fiscal necessity, not to be politicized by politicians and policymakers to increase unnecessary and wasteful government spending that would expose countries to a higher degree of economic vulnerability.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This commentary critically analyzes the debate between ‘deficit financing’ and ‘deficit-reduction financing’ in contemporary economics. Reading through the paper by Ann Pettifor (2019), one gets the impression that deficits don’t matter and that fiscal consolidation has not improved the public finances, at least for the advanced economies. Although Pettifor manages to pinpoint some of the fundamental errors in contemporary economic discussions on deficit financing, her paper puts undue emphasis on Keynes’s approach to public spending. Keynes’s argument was that increases in government spending will improve growth by boosting purchasing power into the economy. However, she fails to notice the basic problem with debt, that it keeps countries from investing in future growth. A more fundamental question to this debate should be to address the issues surrounding the sustainability of debt and the most effective means to reduce debt to sustainable levels. Therefore, fiscal restraint should be taken as an opportunity to make an economic virtue out of fiscal necessity, not to be politicized by politicians and policymakers to increase unnecessary and wasteful government spending that would expose countries to a higher degree of economic vulnerability.

Key concepts: Austerity, Economics, Deficit spending, Debt, Fiscal deficit, Government debt, Fiscal policy, Fiscal sustainability

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sustainable Level Debt, Expansionary Austerity, and Fiscal Consolidation Theories: A Critical Analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens