International Law as Human Choice
Anna Spain Bradley
Abstract
Anna Spain Bradley
Abstract
On July 8, 1996, the world awoke to a landmark advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice (ICJ): “Nations are not prohibited from using or threatening to use nuclear weapons under international law.” Less than two years prior, and after decades of concern about the harm that the existence of nuclear weapons could do to the world, the UN General Assembly had requested that the ICJ provide an advisory opinion on the following question: “Is the threat or use of nuclear weapons in any circumstance permitted under international law?”
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
On July 8, 1996, the world awoke to a landmark advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice (ICJ): “Nations are not prohibited from using or threatening to use nuclear weapons under international law.” Less than two years prior, and after decades of concern about the harm that the existence of nuclear weapons could do to the world, the UN General Assembly had requested that the ICJ provide an advisory opinion on the following question: “Is the threat or use of nuclear weapons in any circumstance permitted under international law?”
Key concepts: Advisory opinion, International court, Nuclear weapon, Law, Political science, International law, Harm, General assembly