2019Revue francaise dadministration publiqueRequires access

Theory of the unitary executive and presidential oversight of independent agencies in the United States

Dominique Custos

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

During the XXth century, limits were imposed on the President’s ability to control independent agencies. Thus independent agencies are protected not only against full control of the appointment and at-will removal of their commissioners/administrators by the President but also against full presidential oversight of their rulemaking processes. During the current early decades of the XXIst century, due to the increasing influence of the unitary executive theory, this dual protection has been showing signs of destabilization. Nowadays, the most tangible manifestations of destabilization are to be found in court decisions dealing with appointment and removal protection. As a result, the capacity of Congress to design the administrative state is restricted with regard to not only independent agencies’ commissioners/administrators but also to their administrative law judges.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

During the XXth century, limits were imposed on the President’s ability to control independent agencies. Thus independent agencies are protected not only against full control of the appointment and at-will removal of their commissioners/administrators by the President but also against full presidential oversight of their rulemaking processes. During the current early decades of the XXIst century, due to the increasing influence of the unitary executive theory, this dual protection has been showing signs of destabilization. Nowadays, the most tangible manifestations of destabilization are to be found in court decisions dealing with appointment and removal protection. As a result, the capacity of Congress to design the administrative state is restricted with regard to not only independent agencies’ commissioners/administrators but also to their administrative law judges.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

During the XXth century, limits were imposed on the President’s ability to control independent agencies. Thus independent agencies are protected not only against full control of the appointment and at-will removal of their commissioners/administrators by the President but also against full presidential oversight of their rulemaking processes. During the current early decades of the XXIst century, due to the increasing influence of the unitary executive theory, this dual protection has been showing signs of destabilization. Nowadays, the most tangible manifestations of destabilization are to be found in court decisions dealing with appointment and removal protection. As a result, the capacity of Congress to design the administrative state is restricted with regard to not only independent agencies’ commissioners/administrators but also to their administrative law judges.

Key concepts: Rulemaking, Presidential system, Unitary state, Administrative law, Political science, Bureaucracy, Executive branch, State (computer science)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Theory of the unitary executive and presidential oversight of independent agencies in the United States — Research Paper | ScholarLens