2021Unpublished venueRequires access

The Marician Aesthetics

Max Eastman

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Most of the new ‘Marxian’ critics use these terms interchangeably, as if they were synonyms, and as a result some very strange things happen. Still more abusive is the use of ‘bourgeois’ in a double sense to mean a person of a certain economic status or a non-communist. A communist, on the other hand, is a person who, regardless of his economic position, holds a certain definite set of opinions. Most of the new ‘Marxian’ critics use the terms interchangeably, as if they were synonyms, and as a result some very strange things happen. The Marxist means by communist literature, literature which serves the communist purpose, and by bourgeois literature, literature which hinders it. Perhaps the best evidence of its influence is the fact that even Leon Trotsky, who in general stands head and shoulders out of it in the clear air, thinks that if someone should come along who could “grasp all the new generalizations” of physical science.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Most of the new ‘Marxian’ critics use these terms interchangeably, as if they were synonyms, and as a result some very strange things happen. Still more abusive is the use of ‘bourgeois’ in a double sense to mean a person of a certain economic status or a non-communist. A communist, on the other hand, is a person who, regardless of his economic position, holds a certain definite set of opinions. Most of the new ‘Marxian’ critics use the terms interchangeably, as if they were synonyms, and as a result some very strange things happen. The Marxist means by communist literature, literature which serves the communist purpose, and by bourgeois literature, literature which hinders it. Perhaps the best evidence of its influence is the fact that even Leon Trotsky, who in general stands head and shoulders out of it in the clear air, thinks that if someone should come along who could “grasp all the new generalizations” of physical science.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Most of the new ‘Marxian’ critics use these terms interchangeably, as if they were synonyms, and as a result some very strange things happen. Still more abusive is the use of ‘bourgeois’ in a double sense to mean a person of a certain economic status or a non-communist. A communist, on the other hand, is a person who, regardless of his economic position, holds a certain definite set of opinions. Most of the new ‘Marxian’ critics use the terms interchangeably, as if they were synonyms, and as a result some very strange things happen. The Marxist means by communist literature, literature which serves the communist purpose, and by bourgeois literature, literature which hinders it. Perhaps the best evidence of its influence is the fact that even Leon Trotsky, who in general stands head and shoulders out of it in the clear air, thinks that if someone should come along who could “grasp all the new generalizations” of physical science.

Key concepts: Aesthetics, Art

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Marician Aesthetics — Research Paper | ScholarLens