2021•SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Homeland Security Twenty Years After 9/11: Addressing Evolving Threats

Eric Swalwell, R. Kyle Alagood

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

Security risks are not static, so security policy must evolve. Bureaucratic inertia, preparing for past wars without looking to the future, and narrowly focusing on traditional risks makes the country less safe. National security and homeland security policymakers must shore up current vulnerabilities and anticipate emerging risks. In the counterterrorism context, that means reforming gun laws that have contributed to repeat mass shootings, examining domestic extremist ideology that may lead people to commit bad acts, and countering public health misinformation that negatively impacts national security — all while respecting civil liberties. This article examines the successes, failures, and policies at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and proposes reforms to ensure the Department is prepared for dynamic future threats to the United States.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Security risks are not static, so security policy must evolve. Bureaucratic inertia, preparing for past wars without looking to the future, and narrowly focusing on traditional risks makes the country less safe. National security and homeland security policymakers must shore up current vulnerabilities and anticipate emerging risks. In the counterterrorism context, that means reforming gun laws that have contributed to repeat mass shootings, examining domestic extremist ideology that may lead people to commit bad acts, and countering public health misinformation that negatively impacts national security — all while respecting civil liberties. This article examines the successes, failures, and policies at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and proposes reforms to ensure the Department is prepared for dynamic future threats to the United States.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Security risks are not static, so security policy must evolve. Bureaucratic inertia, preparing for past wars without looking to the future, and narrowly focusing on traditional risks makes the country less safe. National security and homeland security policymakers must shore up current vulnerabilities and anticipate emerging risks. In the counterterrorism context, that means reforming gun laws that have contributed to repeat mass shootings, examining domestic extremist ideology that may lead people to commit bad acts, and countering public health misinformation that negatively impacts national security — all while respecting civil liberties. This article examines the successes, failures, and policies at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and proposes reforms to ensure the Department is prepared for dynamic future threats to the United States.

Key concepts: Homeland security, National security, Political science, Commit, Context (archaeology), National Strategy to Secure Cyberspace, Bureaucracy, Security studies

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Homeland Security Twenty Years After 9/11: Addressing Evolving Threats — Research Paper | ScholarLens