2021World Journal of Gastrointestinal EndoscopyOpen access

Safety of upper endoscopy in patients with active cocaine use

Anabel Liyen Cartelle, Alexander Nguyen, Parth Desai, Vikram Kotwal, Jinal Makhija, Jie Yu, John Erikson Yap

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: a positive urine toxicology test, has been mostly addressed in the surgical and obstetrical literature. However, there are no clear guidelines on how to effectively risk stratify patients found to be positive for cocaine in the pre-operative setting, often leading to costly procedure cancellations. Within the field of gastroenterology, there is no current data available regarding safety of performing esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in patients with recent cocaine use. AIM: To compare the prevalence of EGD related complications between active (≤ 5 d) and remote (> 5 d) users of cocaine. METHODS: -test, chi-square, Wilcoxon rank sum, and Fisher exact test. RESULTS: < 0.05). There were no significant differences in overall hemodynamics between both groups. CONCLUSION: remote use of cocaine. Interestingly, there were significantly more patients (30%) with active use of cocaine that required general anesthesia as compared to remote users (0%).

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: a positive urine toxicology test, has been mostly addressed in the surgical and obstetrical literature. However, there are no clear guidelines on how to effectively risk stratify patients found to be positive for cocaine in the pre-operative setting, often leading to costly procedure cancellations. Within the field of gastroenterology, there is no current data available regarding safety of performing esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in patients with recent cocaine use. AIM: To compare the prevalence of EGD related complications between active (≤ 5 d) and remote (> 5 d) users of cocaine. METHODS: -test, chi-square, Wilcoxon rank sum, and Fisher exact test. RESULTS: < 0.05). There were no significant differences in overall hemodynamics between both groups. CONCLUSION: remote use of cocaine. Interestingly, there were significantly more patients (30%) with active use of cocaine that required general anesthesia as compared to remote users (0%).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: a positive urine toxicology test, has been mostly addressed in the surgical and obstetrical literature. However, there are no clear guidelines on how to effectively risk stratify patients found to be positive for cocaine in the pre-operative setting, often leading to costly procedure cancellations. Within the field of gastroenterology, there is no current data available regarding safety of performing esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in patients with recent cocaine use. AIM: To compare the prevalence of EGD related complications between active (≤ 5 d) and remote (> 5 d) users of cocaine. METHODS: -test, chi-square, Wilcoxon rank sum, and Fisher exact test. RESULTS: < 0.05). There were no significant differences in overall hemodynamics between both groups. CONCLUSION: remote use of cocaine. Interestingly, there were significantly more patients (30%) with active use of cocaine that required general anesthesia as compared to remote users (0%).

Key concepts: Medicine, Esophagogastroduodenoscopy, Benzoylecgonine, Adverse effect, Exact test, Blood pressure, Ureteroscopy, Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Safety of upper endoscopy in patients with active cocaine use — Research Paper | ScholarLens