Turn Taking used in Conversation Class: A Classroom Discourse Analysis
Lailatus Sa’adah, Rani Yulianti
Abstract
Lailatus Sa’adah, Rani Yulianti
Abstract
This paper aimed to analyze the turn taking used by the teacher and students in conversation class and provide the authentic evidence of the classroom discourse. The script of conversation were chosen as the materials of the study. The analysis of turn taking is adopted from Sinclair and Coulthard’s framework (1975, cited in Christie, 2002) of IRF (Initiation, Response, Feedback) and Mehan’s work (1979, cited in Rymes, 2008) who proposed IRE (Initiation, Response, Evaluation). The underlying structure of the pattern is: (a) Teacher question or Initiation, (b) Student Response, and (c) Teacher evaluation or feedback (Bloome, et.al 2005).
OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper aimed to analyze the turn taking used by the teacher and students in conversation class and provide the authentic evidence of the classroom discourse. The script of conversation were chosen as the materials of the study. The analysis of turn taking is adopted from Sinclair and Coulthard’s framework (1975, cited in Christie, 2002) of IRF (Initiation, Response, Feedback) and Mehan’s work (1979, cited in Rymes, 2008) who proposed IRE (Initiation, Response, Evaluation). The underlying structure of the pattern is: (a) Teacher question or Initiation, (b) Student Response, and (c) Teacher evaluation or feedback (Bloome, et.al 2005).
Key concepts: Conversation, Turn-taking, Conversation analysis, Discourse analysis, Class (philosophy), Psychology, Linguistics, Pedagogy