Measurement of Clinical-Effect: Utility
Phantipa Phantipa
Abstract
Phantipa Phantipa
Abstract
The utility approach to assessing health-related quality of life is the most widely used technique for assessing preferences for health outcomes in the economic evaluation of health care. The scale for utility scores assigns a value of 1.0 to perfect health and 0.0 to death. The utility scores are employed to weigh time spent in each health state to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, which is used as the denominator in cost-utility analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis. Utility scores are obtained through direct assessments using techniques such as standard gamble (SG), time-trade off (TTO), and visual analog scale (VAS), or by using multi-attribute systems such as the Health Utilities Index (HUI) or EuroQol (EQ-5D). According to international HE guidelines, the most preferred utility methods are SG and TTO, followed by EQ- 5D, VAS and HUI, respectively. In Thailand, the EQ-5D is the most recommended utility method because it has acceptable feasibility and validity. Keywords: Utility, Preference, Health-related quality of life, Quality of life weights, Quality-adjusted life years, QALYs
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The utility approach to assessing health-related quality of life is the most widely used technique for assessing preferences for health outcomes in the economic evaluation of health care. The scale for utility scores assigns a value of 1.0 to perfect health and 0.0 to death. The utility scores are employed to weigh time spent in each health state to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, which is used as the denominator in cost-utility analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis. Utility scores are obtained through direct assessments using techniques such as standard gamble (SG), time-trade off (TTO), and visual analog scale (VAS), or by using multi-attribute systems such as the Health Utilities Index (HUI) or EuroQol (EQ-5D). According to international HE guidelines, the most preferred utility methods are SG and TTO, followed by EQ- 5D, VAS and HUI, respectively. In Thailand, the EQ-5D is the most recommended utility method because it has acceptable feasibility and validity. Keywords: Utility, Preference, Health-related quality of life, Quality of life weights, Quality-adjusted life years, QALYs
Key concepts: Quality-adjusted life year, Cost–utility analysis, Medicine, EQ-5D, Quality of life (healthcare), Time-trade-off, Visual analogue scale, Economic evaluation