Deterioration of Mixed Rebar and Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Bridge Decks
Corin Treat, Benjamin Z. Dymond
Abstract
Open-access reader
Corin Treat, Benjamin Z. Dymond
Abstract
Open-access reader
Between 1973 and 1989, approximately 600 bridge decks were constructed in Minnesota with a top layer of epoxy-coated rebar and a \nbottom layer of uncoated rebar (i.e., mixed rebar deck) to potentially reduce corrosion in the top layer of rebar. In the last five years, at \nleast 20 bridge decks were constructed with polypropylene fibers in the concrete mix to reduce the width and amount of cracking. This \nproject investigated how mixed rebar or polypropylene fibers affected the rate of deterioration in bridge decks (e.g., spalling of underside \nof deck concrete or unsound concrete on the top wearing surface) compared to control structure decks of approximately the same age. \nVisual inspections were conducted on certain bridges to compare the visual degradation of the mixed rebar and fiber-reinforced decks with \ntheir control structure decks. The results were subdivided to indicate how the superstructure type, average daily traffic, route type, and \nwearing surface crack density affected the condition ratings and rate of deterioration. The mixed rebar decks reached worse condition \nstates than the control structures when comparing the condition of the underside of the deck; steel superstructures had the largest \nnegative affect on the deterioration. Recommendations included: create an inspection rating element for mixed rebar decks that quantifies \nthe underside of deck crack density, use a robust crack sealing method on mixed rebar decks when they have been at NBE Element #12 CS2 \nfor approximately 7 years, and continue comparing fiber-reinforced decks to control structure decks to analyze the deterioration over time.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Between 1973 and 1989, approximately 600 bridge decks were constructed in Minnesota with a top layer of epoxy-coated rebar and a \nbottom layer of uncoated rebar (i.e., mixed rebar deck) to potentially reduce corrosion in the top layer of rebar. In the last five years, at \nleast 20 bridge decks were constructed with polypropylene fibers in the concrete mix to reduce the width and amount of cracking. This \nproject investigated how mixed rebar or polypropylene fibers affected the rate of deterioration in bridge decks (e.g., spalling of underside \nof deck concrete or unsound concrete on the top wearing surface) compared to control structure decks of approximately the same age. \nVisual inspections were conducted on certain bridges to compare the visual degradation of the mixed rebar and fiber-reinforced decks with \ntheir control structure decks. The results were subdivided to indicate how the superstructure type, average daily traffic, route type, and \nwearing surface crack density affected the condition ratings and rate of deterioration. The mixed rebar decks reached worse condition \nstates than the control structures when comparing the condition of the underside of the deck; steel superstructures had the largest \nnegative affect on the deterioration. Recommendations included: create an inspection rating element for mixed rebar decks that quantifies \nthe underside of deck crack density, use a robust crack sealing method on mixed rebar decks when they have been at NBE Element #12 CS2 \nfor approximately 7 years, and continue comparing fiber-reinforced decks to control structure decks to analyze the deterioration over time.
Key concepts: Rebar, Fiber-reinforced concrete, Bridge (graph theory), Reinforced concrete, Forensic engineering, Composite material, Structural engineering, Materials science