2021SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

The Number Nine: Why the Texas Supreme Court Has the Same Number of Justices as the United States Supreme Court

Daniel, M Josiah

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

When the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) and the Supreme Court of Texas (SCOTX) are compared, similarities and differences are seen. The differences are more numerous and result from the specific or idiosyncratic provisions of their respective legal systems’ constitutions and statues. For instance, SCOTUS justices are appointed and serve “during good Behaviour,” while SCOTX justices are elected for six-year terms. The similarities of the two courts are fewer in number, such as the fact that both courts are established in constitutions. One key similarity is the number of justices of each of the courts: nine. This short essay explores the question, “Why nine?” In the case of the SCOTUS, the number of nine justices was established by legislation at the end of the Civil War and has remained unchanged, surviving the intense court-packing challenge of 1937. For the SCOTX, the number of nine seats on the Court was authorized much more recently, in a constitutional amendment that required almost twenty years of effort by a Texas governor, lawyers of the Texas Bar Association, law professors, and the Texas Civil Judicial Council to obtain ratification, finally, in 1945.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

When the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) and the Supreme Court of Texas (SCOTX) are compared, similarities and differences are seen. The differences are more numerous and result from the specific or idiosyncratic provisions of their respective legal systems’ constitutions and statues. For instance, SCOTUS justices are appointed and serve “during good Behaviour,” while SCOTX justices are elected for six-year terms. The similarities of the two courts are fewer in number, such as the fact that both courts are established in constitutions. One key similarity is the number of justices of each of the courts: nine. This short essay explores the question, “Why nine?” In the case of the SCOTUS, the number of nine justices was established by legislation at the end of the Civil War and has remained unchanged, surviving the intense court-packing challenge of 1937. For the SCOTX, the number of nine seats on the Court was authorized much more recently, in a constitutional amendment that required almost twenty years of effort by a Texas governor, lawyers of the Texas Bar Association, law professors, and the Texas Civil Judicial Council to obtain ratification, finally, in 1945.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

When the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) and the Supreme Court of Texas (SCOTX) are compared, similarities and differences are seen. The differences are more numerous and result from the specific or idiosyncratic provisions of their respective legal systems’ constitutions and statues. For instance, SCOTUS justices are appointed and serve “during good Behaviour,” while SCOTX justices are elected for six-year terms. The similarities of the two courts are fewer in number, such as the fact that both courts are established in constitutions. One key similarity is the number of justices of each of the courts: nine. This short essay explores the question, “Why nine?” In the case of the SCOTUS, the number of nine justices was established by legislation at the end of the Civil War and has remained unchanged, surviving the intense court-packing challenge of 1937. For the SCOTX, the number of nine seats on the Court was authorized much more recently, in a constitutional amendment that required almost twenty years of effort by a Texas governor, lawyers of the Texas Bar Association, law professors, and the Texas Civil Judicial Council to obtain ratification, finally, in 1945.

Key concepts: Supreme court, Law, Political science, Ratification, Original jurisdiction, Legislation, Majority opinion, Concurring opinion

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Number Nine: Why the Texas Supreme Court Has the Same Number of Justices as the United States Supreme Court — Research Paper | ScholarLens