2021Open International Journal of InformaticsOpen access

Systematic Literature Review: Factor For Physical Security And Access Control in Maximun Security Protection

Roslinda Mohamed, Hafiza Abas, Noor Hafizah Hassan, Saiful Adli Ismail

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Physical security and access control as one of the installations should be upgraded to confirm the security and readiness of the asset belong to the group to continue safely. As the quick development in technology offers a boundless defence level for physical security and access control in the office, every organization must offer a passable budget pertinent to the transformation of the world today. Through a very humane approach of natural surveillance, access control, maintenance, and reinforcements of territory, this strategy will contribute to the field of physical security as a whole. The purpose of this paper is to recognize the features that regulate taking for perimeter protection and access control in maximum were identified and analysed. The findings have revealed that five categories of features can be used to study the taking for perimeter protection and access control in maximum security protection: physical security; access control; security standard and policy; security awareness program and security training and security protection. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was accepted since it uses a more rigorous and well-defined method to swotting the study indication pertinent to the study. Initially, 62 papers were retrieved by a manual search in six databases and 17 primary studies were finally included. Consequently, 5 factors education.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Physical security and access control as one of the installations should be upgraded to confirm the security and readiness of the asset belong to the group to continue safely. As the quick development in technology offers a boundless defence level for physical security and access control in the office, every organization must offer a passable budget pertinent to the transformation of the world today. Through a very humane approach of natural surveillance, access control, maintenance, and reinforcements of territory, this strategy will contribute to the field of physical security as a whole. The purpose of this paper is to recognize the features that regulate taking for perimeter protection and access control in maximum were identified and analysed. The findings have revealed that five categories of features can be used to study the taking for perimeter protection and access control in maximum security protection: physical security; access control; security standard and policy; security awareness program and security training and security protection. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was accepted since it uses a more rigorous and well-defined method to swotting the study indication pertinent to the study. Initially, 62 papers were retrieved by a manual search in six databases and 17 primary studies were finally included. Consequently, 5 factors education.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Physical security and access control as one of the installations should be upgraded to confirm the security and readiness of the asset belong to the group to continue safely. As the quick development in technology offers a boundless defence level for physical security and access control in the office, every organization must offer a passable budget pertinent to the transformation of the world today. Through a very humane approach of natural surveillance, access control, maintenance, and reinforcements of territory, this strategy will contribute to the field of physical security as a whole. The purpose of this paper is to recognize the features that regulate taking for perimeter protection and access control in maximum were identified and analysed. The findings have revealed that five categories of features can be used to study the taking for perimeter protection and access control in maximum security protection: physical security; access control; security standard and policy; security awareness program and security training and security protection. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was accepted since it uses a more rigorous and well-defined method to swotting the study indication pertinent to the study. Initially, 62 papers were retrieved by a manual search in six databases and 17 primary studies were finally included. Consequently, 5 factors education.

Key concepts: Physical security, Asset (computer security), Physical access, Access control, Computer security, Control (management), Security controls, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Systematic Literature Review: Factor For Physical Security And Access Control in Maximun Security Protection — Research Paper | ScholarLens