2020Unpublished venueRequires access

Simulations of Flow Separation Control Using Different Plasma Actuator Models

Hatem Abdelraouf, Sadek Z. Kassab, Ahmed M. Nagib Elmekawy

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the active flow control on NACA0012 airfoil numerically by introducing dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma actuators. The flow over the airfoil simulations were performed using ANSYS program for free-stream velocity 14.6 m/s with wide range of angle of attacks (from 0 to 20 degrees) on NACA0012 airfoil with applied voltage 16 kV across the electrodes. There are several plasma actuator models, which simulate the effect of the plasma actuator. This paper focuses on two numerical methods: Shyy model and Suzen model. They depend on calculating the induced body force of the plasma and import it in Navier Stokes equation as an external body force. Mesh independence study is performed on the airfoil and validate the results without plasma activation with the experimental results. Two actuators were added at positions 0.1 and 0.3 of the chord length to the airfoil and an investigation is performed on the lift CL and drag Cd coefficients of the airfoil without and with the activation of the plasma. Thereafter, a comparison between the numerical results of two different plasma simulation models that were applied.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract This study investigates the active flow control on NACA0012 airfoil numerically by introducing dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma actuators. The flow over the airfoil simulations were performed using ANSYS program for free-stream velocity 14.6 m/s with wide range of angle of attacks (from 0 to 20 degrees) on NACA0012 airfoil with applied voltage 16 kV across the electrodes. There are several plasma actuator models, which simulate the effect of the plasma actuator. This paper focuses on two numerical methods: Shyy model and Suzen model. They depend on calculating the induced body force of the plasma and import it in Navier Stokes equation as an external body force. Mesh independence study is performed on the airfoil and validate the results without plasma activation with the experimental results. Two actuators were added at positions 0.1 and 0.3 of the chord length to the airfoil and an investigation is performed on the lift CL and drag Cd coefficients of the airfoil without and with the activation of the plasma. Thereafter, a comparison between the numerical results of two different plasma simulation models that were applied.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract This study investigates the active flow control on NACA0012 airfoil numerically by introducing dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma actuators. The flow over the airfoil simulations were performed using ANSYS program for free-stream velocity 14.6 m/s with wide range of angle of attacks (from 0 to 20 degrees) on NACA0012 airfoil with applied voltage 16 kV across the electrodes. There are several plasma actuator models, which simulate the effect of the plasma actuator. This paper focuses on two numerical methods: Shyy model and Suzen model. They depend on calculating the induced body force of the plasma and import it in Navier Stokes equation as an external body force. Mesh independence study is performed on the airfoil and validate the results without plasma activation with the experimental results. Two actuators were added at positions 0.1 and 0.3 of the chord length to the airfoil and an investigation is performed on the lift CL and drag Cd coefficients of the airfoil without and with the activation of the plasma. Thereafter, a comparison between the numerical results of two different plasma simulation models that were applied.

Key concepts: Plasma actuator, Airfoil, Mechanics, Dielectric barrier discharge, Flow control (data), Drag, Actuator, Chord (peer-to-peer)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Simulations of Flow Separation Control Using Different Plasma Actuator Models — Research Paper | ScholarLens