A variation on the Chamberlin trimetric map projection
Brenton R. S. Recht
Abstract
Brenton R. S. Recht
Abstract
We present a variation on the Chamberlin trimetric map projection. This new projection, which we call the matrix trimetric projection, consists of a linear transformation of the squares of the distances between a given point and three control points. The formula of the forward projection is simpler than the Chamberlin projection, and admits an inverse formula which requires numerical iteration of only one parameter. We make comparisons between the two projections using a representative list of control points. The Chamberlin trimetric projection outperforms the matrix trimetric projection on measures of angle deformation and area deformation, but the opposite is true for a measure of distance deformation, and the difference between the results of the projections is small over all measures. The forward Matrix trimetric projection can be calculated in half the time of the Chamberlin trimetric projection. We conclude that the matrix trimetric projection is a viable alternative to the Chamberlin trimetric projection, especially if an inverse is required or speed is important.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We present a variation on the Chamberlin trimetric map projection. This new projection, which we call the matrix trimetric projection, consists of a linear transformation of the squares of the distances between a given point and three control points. The formula of the forward projection is simpler than the Chamberlin projection, and admits an inverse formula which requires numerical iteration of only one parameter. We make comparisons between the two projections using a representative list of control points. The Chamberlin trimetric projection outperforms the matrix trimetric projection on measures of angle deformation and area deformation, but the opposite is true for a measure of distance deformation, and the difference between the results of the projections is small over all measures. The forward Matrix trimetric projection can be calculated in half the time of the Chamberlin trimetric projection. We conclude that the matrix trimetric projection is a viable alternative to the Chamberlin trimetric projection, especially if an inverse is required or speed is important.
Key concepts: Projection (relational algebra), Planar projection, 3D projection, Graphical projection, Mathematics, Matrix (chemical analysis), Inverse, Projection method