2016Scientific Journal for Damietta Faculty of Science/Scientific Journal for Damietta Faculty of Science Open access

Clinical Significance of CD200 and CD56 in Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Salah Aref, Kadry Elbakry, Emad Azmy, Lobna Ibrahim

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

To analyze CD200 and CD56 expression by flow cytometry in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients and whether their overexpression had prognostic impact individually and in combination with each other. Seventy newly diagnosed patients were assessed, of whom 27 were adult ALL and 43 pediatric ALL. Forty seven of 70 cases (67%) showed CD200 expression, and 7 cases (10%) showed CD56 expression but only 3 cases (4.3%) had expression for CD200+ and CD56+. Significance differences were found between CD200& CD56 expression in whole ALL patients group compared to control group (P<0.0001and P<0.001respectively). Splenomegaly and lower hemoglobin and platelet were more frequently observed in CD200+ patients whose also associated with significant increase of myeloid marker CD34 frequency. There were significant differences in overall survival (P= 0.042, P= 0.006) and disease-free survival (P= 0.005, P= 0.002 ) between the CD200+ and CD200- patients in total ALL patients and adult ALL . Whereas, in pediatric ALL OS of CD200+ patients 35.7% compared to 86.2% in CD200-, P= 0.032 but DFS showed non-significant difference (P=0.099). On the other hand, CD56+ patients had lower complete remission rate (14.3% vs. 63.5%, P= 0.018). CD56+ had significant influence on overall than those of CD56- (28.6% with mean 4.7 months vs. 41.1% with mean=11.8 months, P= 0.003) and disease free survival (40% with mean=6.26months vs. 54.9% with mean=14.16, P = 0.006). In respect to combination of two CDs positive had very inferior OS and DFS (mean =0.533 month and 0.150 month). In addition to, increased frequency of CD34 was associated with CD200+, CD56+ patients.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To analyze CD200 and CD56 expression by flow cytometry in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients and whether their overexpression had prognostic impact individually and in combination with each other. Seventy newly diagnosed patients were assessed, of whom 27 were adult ALL and 43 pediatric ALL. Forty seven of 70 cases (67%) showed CD200 expression, and 7 cases (10%) showed CD56 expression but only 3 cases (4.3%) had expression for CD200+ and CD56+. Significance differences were found between CD200& CD56 expression in whole ALL patients group compared to control group (P<0.0001and P<0.001respectively). Splenomegaly and lower hemoglobin and platelet were more frequently observed in CD200+ patients whose also associated with significant increase of myeloid marker CD34 frequency. There were significant differences in overall survival (P= 0.042, P= 0.006) and disease-free survival (P= 0.005, P= 0.002 ) between the CD200+ and CD200- patients in total ALL patients and adult ALL . Whereas, in pediatric ALL OS of CD200+ patients 35.7% compared to 86.2% in CD200-, P= 0.032 but DFS showed non-significant difference (P=0.099). On the other hand, CD56+ patients had lower complete remission rate (14.3% vs. 63.5%, P= 0.018). CD56+ had significant influence on overall than those of CD56- (28.6% with mean 4.7 months vs. 41.1% with mean=11.8 months, P= 0.003) and disease free survival (40% with mean=6.26months vs. 54.9% with mean=14.16, P = 0.006). In respect to combination of two CDs positive had very inferior OS and DFS (mean =0.533 month and 0.150 month). In addition to, increased frequency of CD34 was associated with CD200+, CD56+ patients.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To analyze CD200 and CD56 expression by flow cytometry in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients and whether their overexpression had prognostic impact individually and in combination with each other. Seventy newly diagnosed patients were assessed, of whom 27 were adult ALL and 43 pediatric ALL. Forty seven of 70 cases (67%) showed CD200 expression, and 7 cases (10%) showed CD56 expression but only 3 cases (4.3%) had expression for CD200+ and CD56+. Significance differences were found between CD200& CD56 expression in whole ALL patients group compared to control group (P<0.0001and P<0.001respectively). Splenomegaly and lower hemoglobin and platelet were more frequently observed in CD200+ patients whose also associated with significant increase of myeloid marker CD34 frequency. There were significant differences in overall survival (P= 0.042, P= 0.006) and disease-free survival (P= 0.005, P= 0.002 ) between the CD200+ and CD200- patients in total ALL patients and adult ALL . Whereas, in pediatric ALL OS of CD200+ patients 35.7% compared to 86.2% in CD200-, P= 0.032 but DFS showed non-significant difference (P=0.099). On the other hand, CD56+ patients had lower complete remission rate (14.3% vs. 63.5%, P= 0.018). CD56+ had significant influence on overall than those of CD56- (28.6% with mean 4.7 months vs. 41.1% with mean=11.8 months, P= 0.003) and disease free survival (40% with mean=6.26months vs. 54.9% with mean=14.16, P = 0.006). In respect to combination of two CDs positive had very inferior OS and DFS (mean =0.533 month and 0.150 month). In addition to, increased frequency of CD34 was associated with CD200+, CD56+ patients.

Key concepts: Medicine, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Clinical significance, Hemoglobin, Myeloid leukemia, Flow cytometry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical Significance of CD200 and CD56 in Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia — Research Paper | ScholarLens