Comparison of etomidate and propofol-mediated anesthesia induction followed by intubation and sevoflurane maintenance during ERCP in obese patients.
Tao Ding, Yanlan Hu
Abstract
Tao Ding, Yanlan Hu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: ) and compared the efficacy and safety of etomidate or propofol-mediated anesthesia induction followed by intubation and sevoflurane maintenance during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). METHODS: A total of 180 patients were computer-randomized into a propofol group or an etomidate group, with 90 cases in each group. Patients received anesthesia induction by etomidate or propofol followed by intubation and sevoflurane maintenance during ERCP. Baseline characteristics, information about procedure-related time and satisfaction, and adverse events were collected and compared between the etomidate group and propofol group. RESULTS: -values of 0.019 and 0.004, respectively. CONCLUSION: In obese patients who underwent ERCP and needed intubation, etomidate appears better than propofol for anesthesia induction followed by anesthesia maintenance of sevoflurane.
OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE: ) and compared the efficacy and safety of etomidate or propofol-mediated anesthesia induction followed by intubation and sevoflurane maintenance during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). METHODS: A total of 180 patients were computer-randomized into a propofol group or an etomidate group, with 90 cases in each group. Patients received anesthesia induction by etomidate or propofol followed by intubation and sevoflurane maintenance during ERCP. Baseline characteristics, information about procedure-related time and satisfaction, and adverse events were collected and compared between the etomidate group and propofol group. RESULTS: -values of 0.019 and 0.004, respectively. CONCLUSION: In obese patients who underwent ERCP and needed intubation, etomidate appears better than propofol for anesthesia induction followed by anesthesia maintenance of sevoflurane.
Key concepts: Etomidate, Propofol, Medicine, Anesthesia, Sevoflurane, Intubation