2021PubMedOpen access

Comparison of etomidate and propofol-mediated anesthesia induction followed by intubation and sevoflurane maintenance during ERCP in obese patients.

Tao Ding, Yanlan Hu

Open full text 8 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: ) and compared the efficacy and safety of etomidate or propofol-mediated anesthesia induction followed by intubation and sevoflurane maintenance during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). METHODS: A total of 180 patients were computer-randomized into a propofol group or an etomidate group, with 90 cases in each group. Patients received anesthesia induction by etomidate or propofol followed by intubation and sevoflurane maintenance during ERCP. Baseline characteristics, information about procedure-related time and satisfaction, and adverse events were collected and compared between the etomidate group and propofol group. RESULTS: -values of 0.019 and 0.004, respectively. CONCLUSION: In obese patients who underwent ERCP and needed intubation, etomidate appears better than propofol for anesthesia induction followed by anesthesia maintenance of sevoflurane.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: ) and compared the efficacy and safety of etomidate or propofol-mediated anesthesia induction followed by intubation and sevoflurane maintenance during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). METHODS: A total of 180 patients were computer-randomized into a propofol group or an etomidate group, with 90 cases in each group. Patients received anesthesia induction by etomidate or propofol followed by intubation and sevoflurane maintenance during ERCP. Baseline characteristics, information about procedure-related time and satisfaction, and adverse events were collected and compared between the etomidate group and propofol group. RESULTS: -values of 0.019 and 0.004, respectively. CONCLUSION: In obese patients who underwent ERCP and needed intubation, etomidate appears better than propofol for anesthesia induction followed by anesthesia maintenance of sevoflurane.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: ) and compared the efficacy and safety of etomidate or propofol-mediated anesthesia induction followed by intubation and sevoflurane maintenance during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). METHODS: A total of 180 patients were computer-randomized into a propofol group or an etomidate group, with 90 cases in each group. Patients received anesthesia induction by etomidate or propofol followed by intubation and sevoflurane maintenance during ERCP. Baseline characteristics, information about procedure-related time and satisfaction, and adverse events were collected and compared between the etomidate group and propofol group. RESULTS: -values of 0.019 and 0.004, respectively. CONCLUSION: In obese patients who underwent ERCP and needed intubation, etomidate appears better than propofol for anesthesia induction followed by anesthesia maintenance of sevoflurane.

Key concepts: Etomidate, Propofol, Medicine, Anesthesia, Sevoflurane, Intubation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of etomidate and propofol-mediated anesthesia induction followed by intubation and sevoflurane maintenance during ERCP in obese patients. — Research Paper | ScholarLens