2021•Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Firqa and Iftiraq in Islam

Azmi Bishara

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter demonstrates that the classical literature on firqas does not necessarily depict them as social entities, but mostly as groups of scholars with opinions on doctrine. By this definition, Sunnis constituted neither a firqa (sect in the Weberian sense) nor a ta’ifa: Sunnism began as a jurisprudents’ Islam articulated in opposition to what its proponents considered the deviations of a particular historical period. Nor was Sunnism an original, authentic Islam from which all other firqas diverged. This chapter also notes that the term milla referred to all Muslims— expressing a shared set of core beliefs and practices—and that a strong cultural antipathy developed towards disunity, which was identified with decline and fragmentation. This chapter finally emphasizes the anti-sectarian character of Arab secularism.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter demonstrates that the classical literature on firqas does not necessarily depict them as social entities, but mostly as groups of scholars with opinions on doctrine. By this definition, Sunnis constituted neither a firqa (sect in the Weberian sense) nor a ta’ifa: Sunnism began as a jurisprudents’ Islam articulated in opposition to what its proponents considered the deviations of a particular historical period. Nor was Sunnism an original, authentic Islam from which all other firqas diverged. This chapter also notes that the term milla referred to all Muslims— expressing a shared set of core beliefs and practices—and that a strong cultural antipathy developed towards disunity, which was identified with decline and fragmentation. This chapter finally emphasizes the anti-sectarian character of Arab secularism.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter demonstrates that the classical literature on firqas does not necessarily depict them as social entities, but mostly as groups of scholars with opinions on doctrine. By this definition, Sunnis constituted neither a firqa (sect in the Weberian sense) nor a ta’ifa: Sunnism began as a jurisprudents’ Islam articulated in opposition to what its proponents considered the deviations of a particular historical period. Nor was Sunnism an original, authentic Islam from which all other firqas diverged. This chapter also notes that the term milla referred to all Muslims— expressing a shared set of core beliefs and practices—and that a strong cultural antipathy developed towards disunity, which was identified with decline and fragmentation. This chapter finally emphasizes the anti-sectarian character of Arab secularism.

Key concepts: Antipathy, Islam, Opposition (politics), Sect, History, Genealogy, Philosophy, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Firqa and Iftiraq in Islam — Research Paper | ScholarLens