Some Thoughts on the Housing Component of the Consumer Price Index
Reuben Gronau
Abstract
Open-access reader
Reuben Gronau
Abstract
Open-access reader
The past two decades were a turnaround as far as inflation concerned. For the first time in Israelâs history, it enjoyed âprice stabilityâ. In 2003, the government set the inflation target at its current level of 1â3 percent, and though the inflation rate stayed within this range in only five of the next fourteen years, the average annual inflation rate since then was well within the target (1.2 percent). The combination of the modest pace and the small number of âhitsâ reflects the considerable volatility of price changes of the consumption basket. No component of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) contributed more to this volatility than the housing price component, measuring the cost of housing âservicesâ (as distinct from the âDwellings Price Indexâ index which measures that of the âassetsâ).1 As Figure 1 shows, whereas in the first 3 years, 1999â2002, the housing price component rose 1.6 times faster than the total CPI for those years, in the following five years, it sank at an annual pace of nearly 2 percent, and was the main reason for the modest CPI inflation in those years. Since then, the housing price component rose 2.5 times more rapidly than have the other components of the CPI, boosting the weight of housing in the basket from 21.4 percent in 1999 to 24.7 percent in 2016.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The past two decades were a turnaround as far as inflation concerned. For the first time in Israelâs history, it enjoyed âprice stabilityâ. In 2003, the government set the inflation target at its current level of 1â3 percent, and though the inflation rate stayed within this range in only five of the next fourteen years, the average annual inflation rate since then was well within the target (1.2 percent). The combination of the modest pace and the small number of âhitsâ reflects the considerable volatility of price changes of the consumption basket. No component of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) contributed more to this volatility than the housing price component, measuring the cost of housing âservicesâ (as distinct from the âDwellings Price Indexâ index which measures that of the âassetsâ).1 As Figure 1 shows, whereas in the first 3 years, 1999â2002, the housing price component rose 1.6 times faster than the total CPI for those years, in the following five years, it sank at an annual pace of nearly 2 percent, and was the main reason for the modest CPI inflation in those years. Since then, the housing price component rose 2.5 times more rapidly than have the other components of the CPI, boosting the weight of housing in the basket from 21.4 percent in 1999 to 24.7 percent in 2016.
Key concepts: Economics, Price index, Inflation (cosmology), Producer price index, Volatility (finance), Consumer price index (South Africa), Wholesale price index, Index (typography)