2010Unpublished venueRequires access

Comparison between Method of Triangle Odor Bag and Method of Dynamic Olfactometry in odor concentration of air

Jianguang Xu, Tiantian Liu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

为了比较动态稀释嗅觉计测试法与三点比较式臭袋法用于环境空气中臭气浓度检测方法的优劣和结果的一致性,应用实际臭气检测的方式,通过最小显著差法(LSD)检验方法,比较两种方法检测结果的一致性和显著差异性,结果表明:动态稀释嗅觉计测试法与三点比较式臭袋法的结果具有一致性(P<0.01),因此动态稀释嗅觉计测试法可初步考虑作为评价臭气污染的方法.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

为了比较动态稀释嗅觉计测试法与三点比较式臭袋法用于环境空气中臭气浓度检测方法的优劣和结果的一致性,应用实际臭气检测的方式,通过最小显著差法(LSD)检验方法,比较两种方法检测结果的一致性和显著差异性,结果表明:动态稀释嗅觉计测试法与三点比较式臭袋法的结果具有一致性(P<0.01),因此动态稀释嗅觉计测试法可初步考虑作为评价臭气污染的方法.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

为了比较动态稀释嗅觉计测试法与三点比较式臭袋法用于环境空气中臭气浓度检测方法的优劣和结果的一致性,应用实际臭气检测的方式,通过最小显著差法(LSD)检验方法,比较两种方法检测结果的一致性和显著差异性,结果表明:动态稀释嗅觉计测试法与三点比较式臭袋法的结果具有一致性(P<0.01),因此动态稀释嗅觉计测试法可初步考虑作为评价臭气污染的方法.

Key concepts: Olfactometry, Odor, Environmental science, Chemistry, Organic chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison between Method of Triangle Odor Bag and Method of Dynamic Olfactometry in odor concentration of air — Research Paper | ScholarLens