A Content Analysis of Qualitative Dissertations in Counselor Education
Phillip L. Waalkes, Daniel A. DeCino, Stephen V. Flynn
Abstract
Phillip L. Waalkes, Daniel A. DeCino, Stephen V. Flynn
Abstract
We conducted a qualitative content analysis on counseling dissertations (N= 250) completed between 2017 and 2018. Identified categories included (a) paradigms, philosophies of science, and theories; (b) research methodologies; and (c) trustworthiness. The results indicated an infrequent use of paradigmatic frameworks and a distinct pattern of trustworthiness strategies.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We conducted a qualitative content analysis on counseling dissertations (N= 250) completed between 2017 and 2018. Identified categories included (a) paradigms, philosophies of science, and theories; (b) research methodologies; and (c) trustworthiness. The results indicated an infrequent use of paradigmatic frameworks and a distinct pattern of trustworthiness strategies.
Key concepts: Trustworthiness, Content analysis, Psychology, Content (measure theory), Qualitative research, Qualitative analysis, Counselor education, Pedagogy