2021•International Journal of Data and Network ScienceOpen access

Exploring e-mobile banking implementation barriers on Indonesian millennial generation consumers

Elimawaty Rombe, Zakiyah Zahara, Ira Nuriya Santi, Marjam Desma Rahadhini

Open full text 21 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of value barriers, risk barriers, image barriers, cost barriers and usage barriers on the use of mobile banking in millennial generation customers. This research used a quantitative approach and the sampling technique used is purposive sampling which conducts research on a group of subjects with certain characteristics or is considered closely related to previously known population characteristics. This research was conducted by distributing 140 online questionnaires to mobile banking users and there were 110 questionnaires that were reversed and processed. Sampling methods use snowball sampling. The results indicate that there was a positive but not significant effect between risk barriers and mobile banking adoption intentions. However, there was a negative influence between image barriers and mobile banking adoption intentions. Moreover, there was a positive influence between perceived cost barriers and mobile banking adoption intentions, there was a positive influence between the barriers to use and mobile banking adoption the intention to adopt. Finally, there was a significant influence between value barriers and mobile banking adoption intentions.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of value barriers, risk barriers, image barriers, cost barriers and usage barriers on the use of mobile banking in millennial generation customers. This research used a quantitative approach and the sampling technique used is purposive sampling which conducts research on a group of subjects with certain characteristics or is considered closely related to previously known population characteristics. This research was conducted by distributing 140 online questionnaires to mobile banking users and there were 110 questionnaires that were reversed and processed. Sampling methods use snowball sampling. The results indicate that there was a positive but not significant effect between risk barriers and mobile banking adoption intentions. However, there was a negative influence between image barriers and mobile banking adoption intentions. Moreover, there was a positive influence between perceived cost barriers and mobile banking adoption intentions, there was a positive influence between the barriers to use and mobile banking adoption the intention to adopt. Finally, there was a significant influence between value barriers and mobile banking adoption intentions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of value barriers, risk barriers, image barriers, cost barriers and usage barriers on the use of mobile banking in millennial generation customers. This research used a quantitative approach and the sampling technique used is purposive sampling which conducts research on a group of subjects with certain characteristics or is considered closely related to previously known population characteristics. This research was conducted by distributing 140 online questionnaires to mobile banking users and there were 110 questionnaires that were reversed and processed. Sampling methods use snowball sampling. The results indicate that there was a positive but not significant effect between risk barriers and mobile banking adoption intentions. However, there was a negative influence between image barriers and mobile banking adoption intentions. Moreover, there was a positive influence between perceived cost barriers and mobile banking adoption intentions, there was a positive influence between the barriers to use and mobile banking adoption the intention to adopt. Finally, there was a significant influence between value barriers and mobile banking adoption intentions.

Key concepts: Snowball sampling, Mobile banking, Nonprobability sampling, Business, Indonesian, Marketing, Population, Sampling (signal processing)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Exploring e-mobile banking implementation barriers on Indonesian millennial generation consumers — Research Paper | ScholarLens