Razón, acción y lenguaje en la interpretación actual de Kant
Daniel Leserre
Abstract
Daniel Leserre
Abstract
Beyond methodological differences relevant present lines of Kant’s interpretation coincide in a common core. They held that Kant’s philosophy can have value as a today’s philosophy, they agree with conceiving Kant’s philosophy as a comprehensive totality, and eventually they put the theoretical philosophy under the orientation of the practical one. This article claims that an argument that relates reason, action and language can be identified within that common core, particularly from a renewed assessment of the Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Beyond methodological differences relevant present lines of Kant’s interpretation coincide in a common core. They held that Kant’s philosophy can have value as a today’s philosophy, they agree with conceiving Kant’s philosophy as a comprehensive totality, and eventually they put the theoretical philosophy under the orientation of the practical one. This article claims that an argument that relates reason, action and language can be identified within that common core, particularly from a renewed assessment of the Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View.
Key concepts: Philosophy, Philosophy of language, Epistemology, Philosophy of mind, Philosophy of science, Argument (complex analysis), Interpretation (philosophy), Value (mathematics)