Seismic load receiver reinforced concrete frames infilled with masonry
Djurayev Marufjon
Abstract
Djurayev Marufjon
Abstract
This article shows that the performance of reinforced concrete frames infilled with masonry and bare frames under seismic load was studied and compared using Lira 9.6 software.In general, the stiffness, strength, and resistance to periodic loads of brick-filled carcasses increase. The interaction of carcass and filler is a complex process and little research has been done on this. However, unlike many non-load-bearing elements, brick-filled carcasses can transmit loads to each other with the frame under the influence of seismic loads, in such cases it is difficult to fully determine how brick-filled carcass buildings resist seismic loads.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This article shows that the performance of reinforced concrete frames infilled with masonry and bare frames under seismic load was studied and compared using Lira 9.6 software.In general, the stiffness, strength, and resistance to periodic loads of brick-filled carcasses increase. The interaction of carcass and filler is a complex process and little research has been done on this. However, unlike many non-load-bearing elements, brick-filled carcasses can transmit loads to each other with the frame under the influence of seismic loads, in such cases it is difficult to fully determine how brick-filled carcass buildings resist seismic loads.
Key concepts: Masonry, Structural engineering, Reinforced concrete, Seismic loading, Geology, Geotechnical engineering, Engineering