2021•International Journal of Sustainable EngineeringOpen access

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Two Different Models of a Home Appliance

Mian Mobeen Shaukat, Hammad Masood, Nesar Merah, Fadi Al-Badour, Abdul Qadeer, Soban Afzal

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

This study presents a comparative life-cycle assessment of two juicers, of same power rating and capacity, produced by two different manufacturers. First juicer was produced in Slovenia and the second juicer was produced in China. Life-cycle inventory for each juicer was compiled by considering all the stages of life cycle, including manufacturing, transportation, usage and end-of-life. Simapro software was used for modelling life-cycle inventory and ReCiPe method was used for impact assessment. Life-cycle assessment revealed that despite having the same power rating and capacity, two juicers have significantly different environmental impacts. Juicer produced in Slovenia consumes 50% less power and on average has 20% less environmental impacts. Compact design, efficient motor and frugal use of materials contributed to this superior environmental performance.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study presents a comparative life-cycle assessment of two juicers, of same power rating and capacity, produced by two different manufacturers. First juicer was produced in Slovenia and the second juicer was produced in China. Life-cycle inventory for each juicer was compiled by considering all the stages of life cycle, including manufacturing, transportation, usage and end-of-life. Simapro software was used for modelling life-cycle inventory and ReCiPe method was used for impact assessment. Life-cycle assessment revealed that despite having the same power rating and capacity, two juicers have significantly different environmental impacts. Juicer produced in Slovenia consumes 50% less power and on average has 20% less environmental impacts. Compact design, efficient motor and frugal use of materials contributed to this superior environmental performance.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study presents a comparative life-cycle assessment of two juicers, of same power rating and capacity, produced by two different manufacturers. First juicer was produced in Slovenia and the second juicer was produced in China. Life-cycle inventory for each juicer was compiled by considering all the stages of life cycle, including manufacturing, transportation, usage and end-of-life. Simapro software was used for modelling life-cycle inventory and ReCiPe method was used for impact assessment. Life-cycle assessment revealed that despite having the same power rating and capacity, two juicers have significantly different environmental impacts. Juicer produced in Slovenia consumes 50% less power and on average has 20% less environmental impacts. Compact design, efficient motor and frugal use of materials contributed to this superior environmental performance.

Key concepts: Life-cycle assessment, Life cycle inventory, Environmental impact assessment, Inventory analysis, Environmental economics, Operations management, Engineering, Environmental science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Two Different Models of a Home Appliance — Research Paper | ScholarLens