2021AIAA JournalRequires access

Flow-Control Characteristics with Nanosecond-Pulse Plasma Actuator for Different Airfoil Shapes

Atsushi Komuro, Shoki Kanno, Kento Suzuki, Akira Ando, Taku Nonomura, Keisuke Asai

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

The wind tunnel experiments of separation flow control by a nanosecond-pulse-driven dielectric-barrier-discharge plasma actuator (ns-DBDPA) for three airfoil shapes of NASA-Common-Research-Model (NASA-CRM), Gottingen387, and NACA0015 airfoils were conducted and the results were compared. Aerodynamic forces, surface pressures, and particle image velocimetry images were obtained in the experiments. The results of the aerodynamic force and surface pressure measurements showed that the characteristics of the flow separation control by ns-DBDPA are clearly different depending on the airfoil shape, and particularly the type of stall. NACA0015 exhibited leading-edge stall under the conditions investigated, and ns-DBDPA achieved flow control by producing vortices. NASA-CRM exhibited thin-airfoil stall, and ns-DBDPA increased the maximum lift of the lift curve even after the stall. On the other hand, Gottingen387, which exhibited trailing-edge stall, achieved almost no flow control at any actuator position, actuation frequency, or voltage amplitude. The flow control mechanisms for different types of airfoils are discussed based on the particle image velocimetry measurement results.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The wind tunnel experiments of separation flow control by a nanosecond-pulse-driven dielectric-barrier-discharge plasma actuator (ns-DBDPA) for three airfoil shapes of NASA-Common-Research-Model (NASA-CRM), Gottingen387, and NACA0015 airfoils were conducted and the results were compared. Aerodynamic forces, surface pressures, and particle image velocimetry images were obtained in the experiments. The results of the aerodynamic force and surface pressure measurements showed that the characteristics of the flow separation control by ns-DBDPA are clearly different depending on the airfoil shape, and particularly the type of stall. NACA0015 exhibited leading-edge stall under the conditions investigated, and ns-DBDPA achieved flow control by producing vortices. NASA-CRM exhibited thin-airfoil stall, and ns-DBDPA increased the maximum lift of the lift curve even after the stall. On the other hand, Gottingen387, which exhibited trailing-edge stall, achieved almost no flow control at any actuator position, actuation frequency, or voltage amplitude. The flow control mechanisms for different types of airfoils are discussed based on the particle image velocimetry measurement results.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The wind tunnel experiments of separation flow control by a nanosecond-pulse-driven dielectric-barrier-discharge plasma actuator (ns-DBDPA) for three airfoil shapes of NASA-Common-Research-Model (NASA-CRM), Gottingen387, and NACA0015 airfoils were conducted and the results were compared. Aerodynamic forces, surface pressures, and particle image velocimetry images were obtained in the experiments. The results of the aerodynamic force and surface pressure measurements showed that the characteristics of the flow separation control by ns-DBDPA are clearly different depending on the airfoil shape, and particularly the type of stall. NACA0015 exhibited leading-edge stall under the conditions investigated, and ns-DBDPA achieved flow control by producing vortices. NASA-CRM exhibited thin-airfoil stall, and ns-DBDPA increased the maximum lift of the lift curve even after the stall. On the other hand, Gottingen387, which exhibited trailing-edge stall, achieved almost no flow control at any actuator position, actuation frequency, or voltage amplitude. The flow control mechanisms for different types of airfoils are discussed based on the particle image velocimetry measurement results.

Key concepts: Airfoil, Plasma actuator, Stall (fluid mechanics), Particle image velocimetry, Flow separation, Leading edge, Wind tunnel, Flow control (data)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Flow-Control Characteristics with Nanosecond-Pulse Plasma Actuator for Different Airfoil Shapes — Research Paper | ScholarLens