2021SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Measuring and Comparing the Risk Adjusted Performance, the Correlation and the Covariance of Global Macro Funds and Funds of Funds

Michel Guirguis

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

In this article, we measure and compare the risk adjusted performance, the correlation and the covariance of global macro funds and funds of funds. Specifically, Global macro hedge fund manager focus to generate positive returns based on currency futures and options. He/she focused on fixed – income securities derivatives products or stock indices futures and options. They are trying to eliminate the market risk by examining carefully the macroeconomic indicators and the political trends. They are checking the appreciation or depreciation of currencies by using options and futures. They use spot and forward rates futures and options by checking the interest rates. They check the monetary policy of each country in relation to the macroeconomic indicators, related to employment, gross domestic product, inflation and production. In addition, they check changes in interest rates resulted from short and long – term US treasury fixed income products. On the other hand, funds of hedge funds invest solely in other hedge funds. The hedge fund manager selects funds based on a specific investment strategy or a combination of different investment strategies to achieve a better return. The benefit of combining different investment strategies is to achieve diversification and skilful management to reduce market risk. The disadvantages are the fees of asset management and the incentive fees that are charged to manage these funds. They charge a 2% fee and an incentive fee of 15% to 25 % from the profit that is generated. The double fee structure is a disadvantage of investing in funds of funds. The sample is provided from Data Feeder dataset. It includes hedge funds for the period 1990 to 2003. We find strong negative linear correlation between funds of funds and global macro hedge funds. The covariance matrix is positive and there is large dispersion in average returns by using risk- adjusted measures.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this article, we measure and compare the risk adjusted performance, the correlation and the covariance of global macro funds and funds of funds. Specifically, Global macro hedge fund manager focus to generate positive returns based on currency futures and options. He/she focused on fixed – income securities derivatives products or stock indices futures and options. They are trying to eliminate the market risk by examining carefully the macroeconomic indicators and the political trends. They are checking the appreciation or depreciation of currencies by using options and futures. They use spot and forward rates futures and options by checking the interest rates. They check the monetary policy of each country in relation to the macroeconomic indicators, related to employment, gross domestic product, inflation and production. In addition, they check changes in interest rates resulted from short and long – term US treasury fixed income products. On the other hand, funds of hedge funds invest solely in other hedge funds. The hedge fund manager selects funds based on a specific investment strategy or a combination of different investment strategies to achieve a better return. The benefit of combining different investment strategies is to achieve diversification and skilful management to reduce market risk. The disadvantages are the fees of asset management and the incentive fees that are charged to manage these funds. They charge a 2% fee and an incentive fee of 15% to 25 % from the profit that is generated. The double fee structure is a disadvantage of investing in funds of funds. The sample is provided from Data Feeder dataset. It includes hedge funds for the period 1990 to 2003. We find strong negative linear correlation between funds of funds and global macro hedge funds. The covariance matrix is positive and there is large dispersion in average returns by using risk- adjusted measures.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this article, we measure and compare the risk adjusted performance, the correlation and the covariance of global macro funds and funds of funds. Specifically, Global macro hedge fund manager focus to generate positive returns based on currency futures and options. He/she focused on fixed – income securities derivatives products or stock indices futures and options. They are trying to eliminate the market risk by examining carefully the macroeconomic indicators and the political trends. They are checking the appreciation or depreciation of currencies by using options and futures. They use spot and forward rates futures and options by checking the interest rates. They check the monetary policy of each country in relation to the macroeconomic indicators, related to employment, gross domestic product, inflation and production. In addition, they check changes in interest rates resulted from short and long – term US treasury fixed income products. On the other hand, funds of hedge funds invest solely in other hedge funds. The hedge fund manager selects funds based on a specific investment strategy or a combination of different investment strategies to achieve a better return. The benefit of combining different investment strategies is to achieve diversification and skilful management to reduce market risk. The disadvantages are the fees of asset management and the incentive fees that are charged to manage these funds. They charge a 2% fee and an incentive fee of 15% to 25 % from the profit that is generated. The double fee structure is a disadvantage of investing in funds of funds. The sample is provided from Data Feeder dataset. It includes hedge funds for the period 1990 to 2003. We find strong negative linear correlation between funds of funds and global macro hedge funds. The covariance matrix is positive and there is large dispersion in average returns by using risk- adjusted measures.

Key concepts: Fund of funds, Global assets under management, Passive management, Open-end fund, Hedge fund, Closed-end fund, Alternative beta, Hedge accounting

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Measuring and Comparing the Risk Adjusted Performance, the Correlation and the Covariance of Global Macro Funds and Funds of Funds — Research Paper | ScholarLens