Barth en Hegel: scheiding of verzoening?
M. E. Brinkman
Abstract
M. E. Brinkman
Abstract
Barth never studied Hegel intensively, but especially in the period 1926-1932, partially due to a number of Hegelian theologians such as Marheineke, Domer and Biedermann, he came under the influence of his thought. But already in the first volumes of the C.D., this fascination waned. In the discussion on the relation between Barth and Hegel, it was especially Jüngel, Pannenberg and Küng who have emphasized that modem theology is endebted in an essential way to Hegel. They assert that perspectives to which Barth has given a uniquely theological content are inconceivable without Hegel.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Barth never studied Hegel intensively, but especially in the period 1926-1932, partially due to a number of Hegelian theologians such as Marheineke, Domer and Biedermann, he came under the influence of his thought. But already in the first volumes of the C.D., this fascination waned. In the discussion on the relation between Barth and Hegel, it was especially Jüngel, Pannenberg and Küng who have emphasized that modem theology is endebted in an essential way to Hegel. They assert that perspectives to which Barth has given a uniquely theological content are inconceivable without Hegel.
Key concepts: Hegelianism, Philosophy, Relation (database), Period (music), Epistemology, Theology, Aesthetics, Computer science