1984NTT Journal for Theology and the Study of ReligionRequires access

Barth en Hegel: scheiding of verzoening?

M. E. Brinkman

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Barth never studied Hegel intensively, but especially in the period 1926-1932, partially due to a number of Hegelian theologians such as Marheineke, Domer and Biedermann, he came under the influence of his thought. But already in the first volumes of the C.D., this fascination waned. In the discussion on the relation between Barth and Hegel, it was especially Jüngel, Pannenberg and Küng who have emphasized that modem theology is endebted in an essential way to Hegel. They assert that perspectives to which Barth has given a uniquely theological content are inconceivable without Hegel.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Barth never studied Hegel intensively, but especially in the period 1926-1932, partially due to a number of Hegelian theologians such as Marheineke, Domer and Biedermann, he came under the influence of his thought. But already in the first volumes of the C.D., this fascination waned. In the discussion on the relation between Barth and Hegel, it was especially Jüngel, Pannenberg and Küng who have emphasized that modem theology is endebted in an essential way to Hegel. They assert that perspectives to which Barth has given a uniquely theological content are inconceivable without Hegel.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Barth never studied Hegel intensively, but especially in the period 1926-1932, partially due to a number of Hegelian theologians such as Marheineke, Domer and Biedermann, he came under the influence of his thought. But already in the first volumes of the C.D., this fascination waned. In the discussion on the relation between Barth and Hegel, it was especially Jüngel, Pannenberg and Küng who have emphasized that modem theology is endebted in an essential way to Hegel. They assert that perspectives to which Barth has given a uniquely theological content are inconceivable without Hegel.

Key concepts: Hegelianism, Philosophy, Relation (database), Period (music), Epistemology, Theology, Aesthetics, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Barth en Hegel: scheiding of verzoening? — Research Paper | ScholarLens