2019•The Research Repository @ WVU (West Virginia University)Open access

What’s Good for the Goose is Good for the Gander, Or Is It? The Pitfalls of Using the Court’s Neoliberal Construction of the First Amendment To Protect Secondary Picketing

Anne Marie Lofaso

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

In his article, Labor Picketing, The Right To Protest, and the Neoliberal First Amendment, Professor Blum argues that labor picketing, which has received diminished protection when viewed from the statutory lens of Section 8(b)(4) of the National Labor Relations Act, would receive greater protection if viewed primarily through a constitutional lens.Blum upfront acknowledges that many scholars-notably Cynthia Estlund, Catherine Fisk, Charlotte Garden, Michael Harper, James Gray Pope, and Mark Schneider-as well as several practitioners have made similar arguments.(P.600, n. 14.)However, he brings a fresh approach to this important legal agenda by framing the problem not only as a legal challenge but also from the union lawyers' perspective, which he obtained through surveys and interviews.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In his article, Labor Picketing, The Right To Protest, and the Neoliberal First Amendment, Professor Blum argues that labor picketing, which has received diminished protection when viewed from the statutory lens of Section 8(b)(4) of the National Labor Relations Act, would receive greater protection if viewed primarily through a constitutional lens.Blum upfront acknowledges that many scholars-notably Cynthia Estlund, Catherine Fisk, Charlotte Garden, Michael Harper, James Gray Pope, and Mark Schneider-as well as several practitioners have made similar arguments.(P.600, n. 14.)However, he brings a fresh approach to this important legal agenda by framing the problem not only as a legal challenge but also from the union lawyers' perspective, which he obtained through surveys and interviews.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In his article, Labor Picketing, The Right To Protest, and the Neoliberal First Amendment, Professor Blum argues that labor picketing, which has received diminished protection when viewed from the statutory lens of Section 8(b)(4) of the National Labor Relations Act, would receive greater protection if viewed primarily through a constitutional lens.Blum upfront acknowledges that many scholars-notably Cynthia Estlund, Catherine Fisk, Charlotte Garden, Michael Harper, James Gray Pope, and Mark Schneider-as well as several practitioners have made similar arguments.(P.600, n. 14.)However, he brings a fresh approach to this important legal agenda by framing the problem not only as a legal challenge but also from the union lawyers' perspective, which he obtained through surveys and interviews.

Key concepts: Picketing, Law, Goose, Political science, Biology, Paleontology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
What’s Good for the Goose is Good for the Gander, Or Is It? The Pitfalls of Using the Court’s Neoliberal Construction of the First Amendment To Protect Secondary Picketing — Research Paper | ScholarLens