2021Drugs and Cell Therapies in HematologyRequires access

Comparative study of Bark and Leaves Extract of Prosopis cineraria on Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activity through Quantitative Evaluation of Phytoconstituents

Varsha Pandey, Priyanka Danai, Teena Agrawal

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: The current scenario was aimed to evaluate the antioxidant and antimicrobial potential activities of bark and leaves crude extract of Prosopis cineraria. Methodology: The assay was carried out for phytochemical screening, antibacterial and antioxidant activity. A spectrophotometric analysis was used to assess the total phenolic content (TPC), the total flavonoid content (TFC) and the total tannin content (TTC). The research was performed using various In vitro methods using 1, 1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), Hydrogen peroxide radical scavenging assays (H2O2) and Ferric reduction assay (FRAP) assay. The antimicrobial activity was determined by disc diffusion and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) methods against four bacterial and three fungal strains. Results: The total phenolics and flavonoid content were found to be higher in Hydroalcohol solvent of bark (98.01 ± 1.80 mg GAE/g and 66.95 ± 1.66 mg RE/g respectively) and in methanolic extract of leaves (72.00 ± 1.35 mg GAE/g and 54.46 ± 0.97 mg RE/g respectively).While the tannin content in Hydroalcohol extract of bark (56.30 ± 0.514 mg TAE/g) is more than methanolic extract of leaves (22.65 ± 0.36 mg TAE/g). FRAP value was higher in the hydroalcoholic extract of Bark (537.161±8.31 mg equivalents Ascorbic acid /g of extract) than leaf methanolic extract (315.20±7.40 mg equivalents Ascorbic acid /g of extract) leaf. The hydroalcohol extract of bark [IC50- 391.95 ± 0.008 µg/mL (DPPH), IC50 - 220.44 ± 0.0005 µg/mL (H2O2)] and methanol extract of leaves [IC50- 215.64 ± 0.333 µg/ mL (DPPH), IC50- 138.68±1.160 µg/mL (H2O2)] showed more antioxidant potential as compared to that of others crude extract and even ascorbic acid. The maximum antimicrobial activity was shown by Hydroalcoholic solvent of bark is high rather than methanol solvent of leaves. The zone of inhibition of Hydroalcohol bark extract is7.66 ±2.08 mm, 8.33±1.52 mm, 10±1 mm and 11.33± 1.52mm was observed against Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa respectively. In case of methanol extract of leaves , zone of inhibition  4.33 ±1.154 mm, 5.33 ± 2.081 mm, 7.66 ± 1.527 mm and 6.0 ± 3.0 mm was observed against B. subtilis, S. aureus, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa respectively. Conclusion: The results of this systematic study show that clearly indicated comparative strong possible antioxidant potential and antimicrobial activity in extracts of bark and leaves of P. cineraria.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: The current scenario was aimed to evaluate the antioxidant and antimicrobial potential activities of bark and leaves crude extract of Prosopis cineraria. Methodology: The assay was carried out for phytochemical screening, antibacterial and antioxidant activity. A spectrophotometric analysis was used to assess the total phenolic content (TPC), the total flavonoid content (TFC) and the total tannin content (TTC). The research was performed using various In vitro methods using 1, 1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), Hydrogen peroxide radical scavenging assays (H2O2) and Ferric reduction assay (FRAP) assay. The antimicrobial activity was determined by disc diffusion and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) methods against four bacterial and three fungal strains. Results: The total phenolics and flavonoid content were found to be higher in Hydroalcohol solvent of bark (98.01 ± 1.80 mg GAE/g and 66.95 ± 1.66 mg RE/g respectively) and in methanolic extract of leaves (72.00 ± 1.35 mg GAE/g and 54.46 ± 0.97 mg RE/g respectively).While the tannin content in Hydroalcohol extract of bark (56.30 ± 0.514 mg TAE/g) is more than methanolic extract of leaves (22.65 ± 0.36 mg TAE/g). FRAP value was higher in the hydroalcoholic extract of Bark (537.161±8.31 mg equivalents Ascorbic acid /g of extract) than leaf methanolic extract (315.20±7.40 mg equivalents Ascorbic acid /g of extract) leaf. The hydroalcohol extract of bark [IC50- 391.95 ± 0.008 µg/mL (DPPH), IC50 - 220.44 ± 0.0005 µg/mL (H2O2)] and methanol extract of leaves [IC50- 215.64 ± 0.333 µg/ mL (DPPH), IC50- 138.68±1.160 µg/mL (H2O2)] showed more antioxidant potential as compared to that of others crude extract and even ascorbic acid. The maximum antimicrobial activity was shown by Hydroalcoholic solvent of bark is high rather than methanol solvent of leaves. The zone of inhibition of Hydroalcohol bark extract is7.66 ±2.08 mm, 8.33±1.52 mm, 10±1 mm and 11.33± 1.52mm was observed against Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa respectively. In case of methanol extract of leaves , zone of inhibition  4.33 ±1.154 mm, 5.33 ± 2.081 mm, 7.66 ± 1.527 mm and 6.0 ± 3.0 mm was observed against B. subtilis, S. aureus, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa respectively. Conclusion: The results of this systematic study show that clearly indicated comparative strong possible antioxidant potential and antimicrobial activity in extracts of bark and leaves of P. cineraria.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: The current scenario was aimed to evaluate the antioxidant and antimicrobial potential activities of bark and leaves crude extract of Prosopis cineraria. Methodology: The assay was carried out for phytochemical screening, antibacterial and antioxidant activity. A spectrophotometric analysis was used to assess the total phenolic content (TPC), the total flavonoid content (TFC) and the total tannin content (TTC). The research was performed using various In vitro methods using 1, 1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), Hydrogen peroxide radical scavenging assays (H2O2) and Ferric reduction assay (FRAP) assay. The antimicrobial activity was determined by disc diffusion and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) methods against four bacterial and three fungal strains. Results: The total phenolics and flavonoid content were found to be higher in Hydroalcohol solvent of bark (98.01 ± 1.80 mg GAE/g and 66.95 ± 1.66 mg RE/g respectively) and in methanolic extract of leaves (72.00 ± 1.35 mg GAE/g and 54.46 ± 0.97 mg RE/g respectively).While the tannin content in Hydroalcohol extract of bark (56.30 ± 0.514 mg TAE/g) is more than methanolic extract of leaves (22.65 ± 0.36 mg TAE/g). FRAP value was higher in the hydroalcoholic extract of Bark (537.161±8.31 mg equivalents Ascorbic acid /g of extract) than leaf methanolic extract (315.20±7.40 mg equivalents Ascorbic acid /g of extract) leaf. The hydroalcohol extract of bark [IC50- 391.95 ± 0.008 µg/mL (DPPH), IC50 - 220.44 ± 0.0005 µg/mL (H2O2)] and methanol extract of leaves [IC50- 215.64 ± 0.333 µg/ mL (DPPH), IC50- 138.68±1.160 µg/mL (H2O2)] showed more antioxidant potential as compared to that of others crude extract and even ascorbic acid. The maximum antimicrobial activity was shown by Hydroalcoholic solvent of bark is high rather than methanol solvent of leaves. The zone of inhibition of Hydroalcohol bark extract is7.66 ±2.08 mm, 8.33±1.52 mm, 10±1 mm and 11.33± 1.52mm was observed against Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa respectively. In case of methanol extract of leaves , zone of inhibition  4.33 ±1.154 mm, 5.33 ± 2.081 mm, 7.66 ± 1.527 mm and 6.0 ± 3.0 mm was observed against B. subtilis, S. aureus, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa respectively. Conclusion: The results of this systematic study show that clearly indicated comparative strong possible antioxidant potential and antimicrobial activity in extracts of bark and leaves of P. cineraria.

Key concepts: DPPH, Ascorbic acid, Chemistry, Bark (sound), Phytochemical, Tannin, Flavonoid, Antimicrobial

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative study of Bark and Leaves Extract of Prosopis cineraria on Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activity through Quantitative Evaluation of Phytoconstituents — Research Paper | ScholarLens