2016•Décisions MarketingRequires access

Crowdsourcing versus design thinking: A comparative study of two external innovation approaches during the ideation stage

Aurélie Hemonnet‐Goujot, Julie Fabbri, Delphine Manceau

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Crowdsourcing and design thinking have been the focus of close media attention and are very popular among companies to generate ideas for new products and services. Yet little is known about their advantages and limitations in the ideation stage. Through an in-depth case study where both approaches were used in parallel, a detailed comparison and analysis was conducted. Results show that crowdsourcing helps to generate a large number of ideas within a given timeframe and to identify trends in the market, but is neither cheaper nor faster than other external approaches. Design thinking provides a relevant analytical framework to give meaning to ideas generated by crowdsourcing, but does not always provide solutions that are operational.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Crowdsourcing and design thinking have been the focus of close media attention and are very popular among companies to generate ideas for new products and services. Yet little is known about their advantages and limitations in the ideation stage. Through an in-depth case study where both approaches were used in parallel, a detailed comparison and analysis was conducted. Results show that crowdsourcing helps to generate a large number of ideas within a given timeframe and to identify trends in the market, but is neither cheaper nor faster than other external approaches. Design thinking provides a relevant analytical framework to give meaning to ideas generated by crowdsourcing, but does not always provide solutions that are operational.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Crowdsourcing and design thinking have been the focus of close media attention and are very popular among companies to generate ideas for new products and services. Yet little is known about their advantages and limitations in the ideation stage. Through an in-depth case study where both approaches were used in parallel, a detailed comparison and analysis was conducted. Results show that crowdsourcing helps to generate a large number of ideas within a given timeframe and to identify trends in the market, but is neither cheaper nor faster than other external approaches. Design thinking provides a relevant analytical framework to give meaning to ideas generated by crowdsourcing, but does not always provide solutions that are operational.

Key concepts: Crowdsourcing, Ideation, Design thinking, Meaning (existential), Focus (optics), Computer science, Data science, Knowledge management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Crowdsourcing versus design thinking: A comparative study of two external innovation approaches during the ideation stage — Research Paper | ScholarLens