Radial Forearm Free Flap Reconstruction of Glossectomy Defects Without Tracheostomy
Tara J. Wu, Satvir S. Saggi, Karam W. Badran, Albert Y. Han, Jordan P. Sand, Keith E. Blackwell
Abstract
Tara J. Wu, Satvir S. Saggi, Karam W. Badran, Albert Y. Han, Jordan P. Sand, Keith E. Blackwell
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the feasibility of radial forearm free flap (RFFF) reconstruction of glossectomy defects without tracheostomy tube (TT). Methods: Retrospective review of patients with at least oral tongue defects who underwent RFFF reconstruction. Pre- and intra-operative factors were documented. Post-operative respiratory complications included inability to extubate, pneumonia, or need for re-intubation or TT within 30 days. Results: Twenty-one patients underwent RFFF reconstruction without TT, and 36 patients with TT. The average hospital length of stay was 1.5 days shorter in those without TT ( P < .01). Two patients who underwent TT placement experienced a respiratory complication ( P = .27). There were no respiratory complications among those without TT. After multivariate analyses, large tongue base defect (>25% resection, P < .001) and bilateral neck dissection ( P < .001) were independently associated with TT placement. Conclusions: In our experience, RFFF reconstruction of glossectomy defects is feasible without TT among selected patients with small tongue base defects (≤25% resection) and unilateral neck dissection.
OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objectives: To assess the feasibility of radial forearm free flap (RFFF) reconstruction of glossectomy defects without tracheostomy tube (TT). Methods: Retrospective review of patients with at least oral tongue defects who underwent RFFF reconstruction. Pre- and intra-operative factors were documented. Post-operative respiratory complications included inability to extubate, pneumonia, or need for re-intubation or TT within 30 days. Results: Twenty-one patients underwent RFFF reconstruction without TT, and 36 patients with TT. The average hospital length of stay was 1.5 days shorter in those without TT ( P < .01). Two patients who underwent TT placement experienced a respiratory complication ( P = .27). There were no respiratory complications among those without TT. After multivariate analyses, large tongue base defect (>25% resection, P < .001) and bilateral neck dissection ( P < .001) were independently associated with TT placement. Conclusions: In our experience, RFFF reconstruction of glossectomy defects is feasible without TT among selected patients with small tongue base defects (≤25% resection) and unilateral neck dissection.
Key concepts: Glossectomy, Medicine, Surgery, Tongue, Neck dissection, Dissection (medical), Intubation, Complication