2021Unpublished venueRequires access

Multiculturalism to Integration

Abeeda Qureshi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter discusses the conceptual and theoretical debate around multiculturalism, integration and interculturalism. The analysis focuses specifically on the liberal and liberal critiques of multiculturalism and examines the development in the debate. It further analyses whether other theoretical concepts, for example integration and interculturalism, are able to resolve issues based on religio-cultural practices and are considered fundamental to a minority group. The book argues that whether it is multiculturalism, integration or interculturalism, the importance of dialogue between the host and the immigrant community cannot be ignored. However, it is argued here that the dialogue needs to be initiated at two levels: between the government and the community leaders, as has been argued by Parekh; and between the traditional and conservative sections of the community and the moderate voices within the community itself. It is emphasised that the dialogue within the community between the liberal, moderate, traditional and conservative groups would make integration much easier than an approach that supports an assimilationist approach from the dominant group. Such an approach, it is argued, could further harden the community and may be detrimental to the integration of the society as a whole.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter discusses the conceptual and theoretical debate around multiculturalism, integration and interculturalism. The analysis focuses specifically on the liberal and liberal critiques of multiculturalism and examines the development in the debate. It further analyses whether other theoretical concepts, for example integration and interculturalism, are able to resolve issues based on religio-cultural practices and are considered fundamental to a minority group. The book argues that whether it is multiculturalism, integration or interculturalism, the importance of dialogue between the host and the immigrant community cannot be ignored. However, it is argued here that the dialogue needs to be initiated at two levels: between the government and the community leaders, as has been argued by Parekh; and between the traditional and conservative sections of the community and the moderate voices within the community itself. It is emphasised that the dialogue within the community between the liberal, moderate, traditional and conservative groups would make integration much easier than an approach that supports an assimilationist approach from the dominant group. Such an approach, it is argued, could further harden the community and may be detrimental to the integration of the society as a whole.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter discusses the conceptual and theoretical debate around multiculturalism, integration and interculturalism. The analysis focuses specifically on the liberal and liberal critiques of multiculturalism and examines the development in the debate. It further analyses whether other theoretical concepts, for example integration and interculturalism, are able to resolve issues based on religio-cultural practices and are considered fundamental to a minority group. The book argues that whether it is multiculturalism, integration or interculturalism, the importance of dialogue between the host and the immigrant community cannot be ignored. However, it is argued here that the dialogue needs to be initiated at two levels: between the government and the community leaders, as has been argued by Parekh; and between the traditional and conservative sections of the community and the moderate voices within the community itself. It is emphasised that the dialogue within the community between the liberal, moderate, traditional and conservative groups would make integration much easier than an approach that supports an assimilationist approach from the dominant group. Such an approach, it is argued, could further harden the community and may be detrimental to the integration of the society as a whole.

Key concepts: Multiculturalism, Political science, Sociology, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Multiculturalism to Integration — Research Paper | ScholarLens