2021Unpublished venueRequires access

Critical theory today

Gerard Delanty, Neal Harris

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Today, the term ‘critical theory’ is often used in an expansive manner, applied to traditions as varied as Foucault&s;s biopolitics, Debord&s;s psychogeography and Lacanian psychoanalysis. While these authors have undeniably expanded the reach of critical theory, this chapter focuses on the primary ideas of the core Frankfurt School theorists based at the Institute for Social Research. In this regard, the signifier ‘critical theory’ is best read as a euphemism for ‘Marxian-inflected social research’. This is not to suggest that there is a pure Marxist kernel of ‘critical theory’ which today risks being tainted by exposure to post-structuralist and deconstructionist currents. On the contrary, an open, interdisciplinary sensitivity is central to the Frankfurt School&s;s approach. Rather, as we argued in this chapter, the Frankfurt School&s;s iteration of critical theory retains its coherence through its development of ideas rooted in German Idealism, a coherence, which at times, is stretched by some of its more divergent contemporary practitioners.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Today, the term ‘critical theory’ is often used in an expansive manner, applied to traditions as varied as Foucault&s;s biopolitics, Debord&s;s psychogeography and Lacanian psychoanalysis. While these authors have undeniably expanded the reach of critical theory, this chapter focuses on the primary ideas of the core Frankfurt School theorists based at the Institute for Social Research. In this regard, the signifier ‘critical theory’ is best read as a euphemism for ‘Marxian-inflected social research’. This is not to suggest that there is a pure Marxist kernel of ‘critical theory’ which today risks being tainted by exposure to post-structuralist and deconstructionist currents. On the contrary, an open, interdisciplinary sensitivity is central to the Frankfurt School&s;s approach. Rather, as we argued in this chapter, the Frankfurt School&s;s iteration of critical theory retains its coherence through its development of ideas rooted in German Idealism, a coherence, which at times, is stretched by some of its more divergent contemporary practitioners.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Today, the term ‘critical theory’ is often used in an expansive manner, applied to traditions as varied as Foucault&s;s biopolitics, Debord&s;s psychogeography and Lacanian psychoanalysis. While these authors have undeniably expanded the reach of critical theory, this chapter focuses on the primary ideas of the core Frankfurt School theorists based at the Institute for Social Research. In this regard, the signifier ‘critical theory’ is best read as a euphemism for ‘Marxian-inflected social research’. This is not to suggest that there is a pure Marxist kernel of ‘critical theory’ which today risks being tainted by exposure to post-structuralist and deconstructionist currents. On the contrary, an open, interdisciplinary sensitivity is central to the Frankfurt School&s;s approach. Rather, as we argued in this chapter, the Frankfurt School&s;s iteration of critical theory retains its coherence through its development of ideas rooted in German Idealism, a coherence, which at times, is stretched by some of its more divergent contemporary practitioners.

Key concepts: Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Critical theory today — Research Paper | ScholarLens