Aluminum Applications to Naval Ship Design and Shipbuilding
Thomas Lamb, Nathaniel Beavers
Abstract
Thomas Lamb, Nathaniel Beavers
Abstract
In an earlier paper, the authors conducted an analysis of the difference in acquisition and total ownership costs of steel and aluminum equivalent naval ship designs. It was shown that an aluminum ship can be built within just 7.5% of the acquisition cost of an equivalent steel ship. This is possible because of the cascading benefits of the aluminum ship’s significantly lighter weight. The aluminum ship was also shown to have operational and total ownership cost advantages. This paper reports on additional design effort conducted by the authors that validates the structural and fire insulation weight estimates used for both ship designs in the earlier paper.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In an earlier paper, the authors conducted an analysis of the difference in acquisition and total ownership costs of steel and aluminum equivalent naval ship designs. It was shown that an aluminum ship can be built within just 7.5% of the acquisition cost of an equivalent steel ship. This is possible because of the cascading benefits of the aluminum ship’s significantly lighter weight. The aluminum ship was also shown to have operational and total ownership cost advantages. This paper reports on additional design effort conducted by the authors that validates the structural and fire insulation weight estimates used for both ship designs in the earlier paper.
Key concepts: Shipbuilding, Naval architecture, Marine engineering, Total cost of ownership, Engineering, Aluminium, Computer science, Operating system