2021Edward Elgar Publishing eBooksRequires access

The nature of DSGE macroeconomics

Alex Rosenberg

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Contemporary macroeconomic theory is dominated by one type of modelling— dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) modelling. The widespread acceptance of this type of model as a satisfactory explanatory account of the macroeconomy, despite a decade or more of apparently very strong counter evidence, demands explanation. Moreover, the sharp differences between such macro models and macro models in natural science raise important questions about its relationship to macroeconomic data. The demand for and the nature of so-called microfoundations in DSGE macroeconomic models is also startlingly different from the role of microfoundations for macro models in natural sciences. Altogether the methodologically anomalous character of DSGE macroeconomics calls for an analysis that distinguishes its cognitive status from macro models elsewhere in science. This chapter attempts to provide one.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Contemporary macroeconomic theory is dominated by one type of modelling— dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) modelling. The widespread acceptance of this type of model as a satisfactory explanatory account of the macroeconomy, despite a decade or more of apparently very strong counter evidence, demands explanation. Moreover, the sharp differences between such macro models and macro models in natural science raise important questions about its relationship to macroeconomic data. The demand for and the nature of so-called microfoundations in DSGE macroeconomic models is also startlingly different from the role of microfoundations for macro models in natural sciences. Altogether the methodologically anomalous character of DSGE macroeconomics calls for an analysis that distinguishes its cognitive status from macro models elsewhere in science. This chapter attempts to provide one.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Contemporary macroeconomic theory is dominated by one type of modelling— dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) modelling. The widespread acceptance of this type of model as a satisfactory explanatory account of the macroeconomy, despite a decade or more of apparently very strong counter evidence, demands explanation. Moreover, the sharp differences between such macro models and macro models in natural science raise important questions about its relationship to macroeconomic data. The demand for and the nature of so-called microfoundations in DSGE macroeconomic models is also startlingly different from the role of microfoundations for macro models in natural sciences. Altogether the methodologically anomalous character of DSGE macroeconomics calls for an analysis that distinguishes its cognitive status from macro models elsewhere in science. This chapter attempts to provide one.

Key concepts: Dynamic stochastic general equilibrium, Microfoundations, Economics, Macro, Keynesian economics, Macroeconomics, Macroeconomic model, Econometrics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The nature of DSGE macroeconomics — Research Paper | ScholarLens