2021•Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative InquiryOpen access

The Impact of Various Payment Method on the Use and Quality of Health Services

Lucky Kartanto, Aa Hubur, Rahul Singh Chauhan, Rully Afrita Harlianty, Yenny Marthalena

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

From an economic point of view, the salary of the general practitioner group is relatively much lower than the specialists or doctors who doubles in management. However, in the regency or remote hospitals, the role of general practitioners is still very noticeable. When compared to general practitioners, the salary of specialists is greater in most hospitals. The definitions of a specialist doctor's salary  is all the income they (specialist doctors) get from their profession as specialists include salary, fee-for-service income from private practice and in hospitals, and capitation income from health insurance. The impact of various payment method on the use and quality of health services is still a controversy . Various studies are still needed to determine the impact of changes of payment policy. However, some interesting preliminary data are found. Compared to the fee-for-service period, doctors who were paid monthly decreased hospital admissions by 13%, while doctors who were paid on the capitation model decreased admissions by 8%. The fee-for-service payment model tends to increase the cost of health services.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

From an economic point of view, the salary of the general practitioner group is relatively much lower than the specialists or doctors who doubles in management. However, in the regency or remote hospitals, the role of general practitioners is still very noticeable. When compared to general practitioners, the salary of specialists is greater in most hospitals. The definitions of a specialist doctor's salary  is all the income they (specialist doctors) get from their profession as specialists include salary, fee-for-service income from private practice and in hospitals, and capitation income from health insurance. The impact of various payment method on the use and quality of health services is still a controversy . Various studies are still needed to determine the impact of changes of payment policy. However, some interesting preliminary data are found. Compared to the fee-for-service period, doctors who were paid monthly decreased hospital admissions by 13%, while doctors who were paid on the capitation model decreased admissions by 8%. The fee-for-service payment model tends to increase the cost of health services.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

From an economic point of view, the salary of the general practitioner group is relatively much lower than the specialists or doctors who doubles in management. However, in the regency or remote hospitals, the role of general practitioners is still very noticeable. When compared to general practitioners, the salary of specialists is greater in most hospitals. The definitions of a specialist doctor's salary  is all the income they (specialist doctors) get from their profession as specialists include salary, fee-for-service income from private practice and in hospitals, and capitation income from health insurance. The impact of various payment method on the use and quality of health services is still a controversy . Various studies are still needed to determine the impact of changes of payment policy. However, some interesting preliminary data are found. Compared to the fee-for-service period, doctors who were paid monthly decreased hospital admissions by 13%, while doctors who were paid on the capitation model decreased admissions by 8%. The fee-for-service payment model tends to increase the cost of health services.

Key concepts: Salary, Capitation, Payment, Capitation fee, Fee-for-service, Business, Quality (philosophy), Service (business)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Impact of Various Payment Method on the Use and Quality of Health Services — Research Paper | ScholarLens