Control of Aphids in Cotton, 1990
Donald R. Johnson, Glenn Studebaker
Abstract
Donald R. Johnson, Glenn Studebaker
Abstract
Abstract Treatments were applied on 2 and 8 Aug to ‘DES 119’ cotton in Lonoke County, AR using a Spirit high clearance sprayer equipped with a CO2 powered system for spraying small plots. The sprayer was calibrated to deliver 13 gal/acre at 50 psi through TX-6 hollowcone nozzles on a 19-inch spacing. Plots were 2, 38-inch rows, 50 ft long arranged in a randomized complete block design with 4 replications. Evaluations were made 4 DAT using a hand-lens to count the number of aphids on a total of 3.6-inches2 of leaf area on the upper portion of the cotton plants in the center 2 rows in each plot.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract Treatments were applied on 2 and 8 Aug to ‘DES 119’ cotton in Lonoke County, AR using a Spirit high clearance sprayer equipped with a CO2 powered system for spraying small plots. The sprayer was calibrated to deliver 13 gal/acre at 50 psi through TX-6 hollowcone nozzles on a 19-inch spacing. Plots were 2, 38-inch rows, 50 ft long arranged in a randomized complete block design with 4 replications. Evaluations were made 4 DAT using a hand-lens to count the number of aphids on a total of 3.6-inches2 of leaf area on the upper portion of the cotton plants in the center 2 rows in each plot.
Key concepts: Sprayer, Acre, Randomized block design, Row, Mathematics, Block (permutation group theory), Horticulture, Agronomy