2019Journal of Pharmacognosy and PhytochemistryOpen access

Field efficacy of a novel ready-mix molecule Novaluron (5.25% SC) + Emamectin (0.9% SC) against Diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella L.) on cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. Capitata)

Lipsa Dash, A. Konar, Subhashree Priyadarshini

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Field efficacy of different Novaluron (5.25% SC) + Emamectin (0.9% SC) treatment schedules was assessed against diamondback moth on cabbage during rabi season in 2014-15 at “In Check Farm”, C-Block, B.C.K.V., Kalyani, Nadia, West Bengal. After three rounds of sprays, Novaluron (5.25% SC) + Emamectin (0.9%SC) @925ml/ha registered 93.10% mortality followed by Novaluron 10%SC@ 750ml/ha and Novaluron (5.25% SC) + Emamectin (0.9% SC) @875ml/ha with 87.01% mortality and 81.18% mortality respectively. Highest yield (18.33t/ha that was 30.95% increase over control) was recorded in Novaluron (5.25% SC) + Emamectin (0.9% SC) @925ml/ha followed by Novaluron 10% SC@ 750ml/ha (17.67t/ha) and Novaluron (5.25% SC) + Emamectin (0.9% SC) @ 875ml/ha (16.67t/ha). Hence Novaluron (5.25% SC) + Emamectin (0.9% SC) @925ml/ha was found to be most effective in reducing population of diamondback moth on cabbage and also gave the highest cost: benefit ratio.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Field efficacy of different Novaluron (5.25% SC) + Emamectin (0.9% SC) treatment schedules was assessed against diamondback moth on cabbage during rabi season in 2014-15 at “In Check Farm”, C-Block, B.C.K.V., Kalyani, Nadia, West Bengal. After three rounds of sprays, Novaluron (5.25% SC) + Emamectin (0.9%SC) @925ml/ha registered 93.10% mortality followed by Novaluron 10%SC@ 750ml/ha and Novaluron (5.25% SC) + Emamectin (0.9% SC) @875ml/ha with 87.01% mortality and 81.18% mortality respectively. Highest yield (18.33t/ha that was 30.95% increase over control) was recorded in Novaluron (5.25% SC) + Emamectin (0.9% SC) @925ml/ha followed by Novaluron 10% SC@ 750ml/ha (17.67t/ha) and Novaluron (5.25% SC) + Emamectin (0.9% SC) @ 875ml/ha (16.67t/ha). Hence Novaluron (5.25% SC) + Emamectin (0.9% SC) @925ml/ha was found to be most effective in reducing population of diamondback moth on cabbage and also gave the highest cost: benefit ratio.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Field efficacy of different Novaluron (5.25% SC) + Emamectin (0.9% SC) treatment schedules was assessed against diamondback moth on cabbage during rabi season in 2014-15 at “In Check Farm”, C-Block, B.C.K.V., Kalyani, Nadia, West Bengal. After three rounds of sprays, Novaluron (5.25% SC) + Emamectin (0.9%SC) @925ml/ha registered 93.10% mortality followed by Novaluron 10%SC@ 750ml/ha and Novaluron (5.25% SC) + Emamectin (0.9% SC) @875ml/ha with 87.01% mortality and 81.18% mortality respectively. Highest yield (18.33t/ha that was 30.95% increase over control) was recorded in Novaluron (5.25% SC) + Emamectin (0.9% SC) @925ml/ha followed by Novaluron 10% SC@ 750ml/ha (17.67t/ha) and Novaluron (5.25% SC) + Emamectin (0.9% SC) @ 875ml/ha (16.67t/ha). Hence Novaluron (5.25% SC) + Emamectin (0.9% SC) @925ml/ha was found to be most effective in reducing population of diamondback moth on cabbage and also gave the highest cost: benefit ratio.

Key concepts: Novaluron, Diamondback moth, Plutella, Toxicology, Population, Biology, Medicine, Larva

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Field efficacy of a novel ready-mix molecule Novaluron (5.25% SC) + Emamectin (0.9% SC) against Diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella L.) on cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. Capitata) — Research Paper | ScholarLens