CHARITIES AND PUBLIC BENEFIT
G. H. L. Fridman
Abstract
G. H. L. Fridman
Abstract
The classification of charitable trusts into four categories includes the undefined final category of trusts: those not for the purpose of education, religion or poverty relief, but still beneficial to the community. Whether a trust of this kind can stand is determined by its satisfaction of two conditions: it is charitable and it is for the public benefit. The author explores the term “public benefit”, as well as judicial limitations placed upon it, the inconsistencies produced by those interpretations, the problems raised in application and the search for a new definition. He presents a tentative new definition for future scholarly consideration.
OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The classification of charitable trusts into four categories includes the undefined final category of trusts: those not for the purpose of education, religion or poverty relief, but still beneficial to the community. Whether a trust of this kind can stand is determined by its satisfaction of two conditions: it is charitable and it is for the public benefit. The author explores the term “public benefit”, as well as judicial limitations placed upon it, the inconsistencies produced by those interpretations, the problems raised in application and the search for a new definition. He presents a tentative new definition for future scholarly consideration.
Key concepts: Poverty, Term (time), Public relations, Political science, Law and economics, Sociology, Law, Physics