2011Kidney Research and Clinical PracticeOpen access

이온치환투석제거율로 측정한 적절 혈액투석의 신뢰도

오준석, 김중경, 김성민, 신용훈, Ki‐Hyun Kim, Young Ki Son, Won-Suk An, 김성은

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Purpose: Quantification of the dialysis dose is an essential element in the management of hemodialysis. The author investigates the reliability of hemodialysis adequacy measured by ionic dialysance (Online clearance monitoring(R), OCM). Because OCM is a non-invasive and instantly accessible method, it could be replaced Kt/V derived from single-pool variable volume urea kinetic model (UKM). Methods: Kt/V using UKM and OCM were measured simultaneously in 51 patients who have received hemodialysis therapy via arteriovenous fistula. The analysis of the data collected from 186 hemodialysis sessions were performed. Results: Kt/V of conventional hemodialysis, high efficiency hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration measured by UKM were 1.39±0.24, 1.41±0.23 and 1.53±0.17, and by OCM were 1.24±0.17, 1.26±0.19 and 1.39±0.19, respectively. The data of UKM were significantly higher than those of OCM (p=0.00). Also, there were strong positive correlations between UKM and OCM in hemodialysis (r=0.80, p=0.00), high efficiency hemodialysis (r=0.65, p=0.00) and hemodiafiltration (r=0.67, p=0.00). Conclusion: The Kt/V using OCM measured by ionic dialysance provided slightly lower data than that of UKM derived from single-pool variable volume urea kinetic model, but it may be a reliable test to evaluate dialysis adequacy in conventional hemodialysis, high efficiency hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose: Quantification of the dialysis dose is an essential element in the management of hemodialysis. The author investigates the reliability of hemodialysis adequacy measured by ionic dialysance (Online clearance monitoring(R), OCM). Because OCM is a non-invasive and instantly accessible method, it could be replaced Kt/V derived from single-pool variable volume urea kinetic model (UKM). Methods: Kt/V using UKM and OCM were measured simultaneously in 51 patients who have received hemodialysis therapy via arteriovenous fistula. The analysis of the data collected from 186 hemodialysis sessions were performed. Results: Kt/V of conventional hemodialysis, high efficiency hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration measured by UKM were 1.39±0.24, 1.41±0.23 and 1.53±0.17, and by OCM were 1.24±0.17, 1.26±0.19 and 1.39±0.19, respectively. The data of UKM were significantly higher than those of OCM (p=0.00). Also, there were strong positive correlations between UKM and OCM in hemodialysis (r=0.80, p=0.00), high efficiency hemodialysis (r=0.65, p=0.00) and hemodiafiltration (r=0.67, p=0.00). Conclusion: The Kt/V using OCM measured by ionic dialysance provided slightly lower data than that of UKM derived from single-pool variable volume urea kinetic model, but it may be a reliable test to evaluate dialysis adequacy in conventional hemodialysis, high efficiency hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose: Quantification of the dialysis dose is an essential element in the management of hemodialysis. The author investigates the reliability of hemodialysis adequacy measured by ionic dialysance (Online clearance monitoring(R), OCM). Because OCM is a non-invasive and instantly accessible method, it could be replaced Kt/V derived from single-pool variable volume urea kinetic model (UKM). Methods: Kt/V using UKM and OCM were measured simultaneously in 51 patients who have received hemodialysis therapy via arteriovenous fistula. The analysis of the data collected from 186 hemodialysis sessions were performed. Results: Kt/V of conventional hemodialysis, high efficiency hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration measured by UKM were 1.39±0.24, 1.41±0.23 and 1.53±0.17, and by OCM were 1.24±0.17, 1.26±0.19 and 1.39±0.19, respectively. The data of UKM were significantly higher than those of OCM (p=0.00). Also, there were strong positive correlations between UKM and OCM in hemodialysis (r=0.80, p=0.00), high efficiency hemodialysis (r=0.65, p=0.00) and hemodiafiltration (r=0.67, p=0.00). Conclusion: The Kt/V using OCM measured by ionic dialysance provided slightly lower data than that of UKM derived from single-pool variable volume urea kinetic model, but it may be a reliable test to evaluate dialysis adequacy in conventional hemodialysis, high efficiency hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration.

Key concepts: Hemodialysis, Medicine, Kt/V, Dialysis adequacy, Dialysis, Urology, Surgery

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
이온치환투석제거율로 측정한 적절 혈액투석의 신뢰도 — Research Paper | ScholarLens