2021Academy of Management ProceedingsRequires access

Organization of Hybrid Governance

Xiaoli Tang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

A key theme for multi-business firms and multinational firms is managing heterogeneous business units or international subsidiaries. Where does the heterogeneity come from? How do firms redeploy resources across differing units to maximize value? In this paper, we identify a particular source of subsidiary variation—entry mode into foreign markets. Firms choose either greenfield investment or M&A when entering a new market. We propose that different entry modes lead to different governance mechanisms by the headquarters towards the subsidiaries, resulting in variation in structure and work contexts of the subsidiaries. This variation then leads to differences in headquarters-subsidiary relationship, and knowledge creation and transfer at the subsidiary level. We test our hypothesis with a field study at a multinational company and find that the firm exerts more dynamic control towards M&A subsidiaries by redeploying more headquarters employees to these subsidiaries than to greenfield subsidiaries, and knowledge created at M&A subsidiaries are less location specific as employees from these subsidiaries tend to be redeployed to more unrelated locations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A key theme for multi-business firms and multinational firms is managing heterogeneous business units or international subsidiaries. Where does the heterogeneity come from? How do firms redeploy resources across differing units to maximize value? In this paper, we identify a particular source of subsidiary variation—entry mode into foreign markets. Firms choose either greenfield investment or M&A when entering a new market. We propose that different entry modes lead to different governance mechanisms by the headquarters towards the subsidiaries, resulting in variation in structure and work contexts of the subsidiaries. This variation then leads to differences in headquarters-subsidiary relationship, and knowledge creation and transfer at the subsidiary level. We test our hypothesis with a field study at a multinational company and find that the firm exerts more dynamic control towards M&A subsidiaries by redeploying more headquarters employees to these subsidiaries than to greenfield subsidiaries, and knowledge created at M&A subsidiaries are less location specific as employees from these subsidiaries tend to be redeployed to more unrelated locations.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A key theme for multi-business firms and multinational firms is managing heterogeneous business units or international subsidiaries. Where does the heterogeneity come from? How do firms redeploy resources across differing units to maximize value? In this paper, we identify a particular source of subsidiary variation—entry mode into foreign markets. Firms choose either greenfield investment or M&A when entering a new market. We propose that different entry modes lead to different governance mechanisms by the headquarters towards the subsidiaries, resulting in variation in structure and work contexts of the subsidiaries. This variation then leads to differences in headquarters-subsidiary relationship, and knowledge creation and transfer at the subsidiary level. We test our hypothesis with a field study at a multinational company and find that the firm exerts more dynamic control towards M&A subsidiaries by redeploying more headquarters employees to these subsidiaries than to greenfield subsidiaries, and knowledge created at M&A subsidiaries are less location specific as employees from these subsidiaries tend to be redeployed to more unrelated locations.

Key concepts: Subsidiary, Multinational corporation, Business, Corporate governance, Industrial organization, International business, Management, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Organization of Hybrid Governance — Research Paper | ScholarLens